ANALISIS YURIDIS SOSIOLOGIS TERHADAP KASUS PENGANIAYAAN ANTAR PEMAIN DALAM PERTANDINGAN SEPAK BOLA(Studi di Polres Solo dan Kantor PSSI Jakarta)

EFFENDI, TAUFIK (2010) ANALISIS YURIDIS SOSIOLOGIS TERHADAP KASUS PENGANIAYAAN ANTAR PEMAIN DALAM PERTANDINGAN SEPAK BOLA(Studi di Polres Solo dan Kantor PSSI Jakarta). Other thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.

[img]
Preview
Text
ANALISIS_YURIDIS_SOSIOLOGIS_TERHADAP_KASUS_PENGANIAYAAN_ANTAR_PEMAIN_DALAM_PERTANDINGAN_SEPAK_BOLA.pdf - Published Version

Download (94kB) | Preview

Abstract

Mistreament or fight can be occured to anyone and anywhere. It is interested if the mistreatment occured in footbal competition. The one of example was case between Nova Zainal with Bernard Maumudu when the United Gresik versus Solos’s Persis. Both of the players were detained by police because their action included of mistretament criminal case so it must overcome by prevail law. Eventhough, according to PSSI Consideration Base that the criminal and civil case in a football coompetition do not carry out to the court. Problem statement of this reserach are: 1. What does the problem between (Nova Zainal and Bernard Maumudu) include in criminal action? 2. How the Police and PSSI overcome the mistreatment or fight was happen among the players in a football competition? This research used sosiology juridical approach, method in collecting the data were interview from PSSI board and Police board and the researcher observes to the Solo’s Polres and Solo’s PSSI Office. Then, the data analyzed descriptively. Based on the rule of PSSI, the dispute in a competition do not carry to the court, it has the rule of the game. In the international world, the law of the sport was known as Lex Sportiva. In football world, the law was created and applied by FIFA, while in Indonesian it was created and applied by PSSI. During the football competition 2 x 45 second prevailed football law. It must refers to football law. States’ laws could not include in as long as the football competition because the state did not create the laws of the game. According to Criminal Code (KUHP) the problem included in section 351 paragraph 1 of Criminal Code, they have proven do the criminal action, and both of them hit each other so it could be categorized as criminal action. In conclusion, the action between Nova Zainal and Bernard Maumudu in juridically could be categorized as mistreatment criminal action that was in section 351 paragraph 1 of Criminal Code. Sugestion, it is necessary for the players to know that their action can stain the sport enthusiasm, so each side obey the prevail organization rule.

Item Type: Thesis (Other)
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Law > Department of Law
Depositing User: Anwar Jasin
Date Deposited: 07 Mar 2012 12:14
Last Modified: 07 Mar 2012 12:14
URI: http://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/347

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item