ANALISIS SUSUNAN PUTUSAN GUGATAN WANPRESTASI BERDASARKAN SURAT KEPUTUSAN KETUA MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 359/KMA/SK/XII/2022

Decree of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Number 359/KMA/SK/XII/2022 concerning Templates and Guidelines for Writing Decisions/Determinations of First Instance and Appellate Courts in Four Judicial Environments under the Supreme Court (SKKMA) to ensure legal certainty in law enforcement in Indonesia. The importance of these guidelines is then aligned with the existing practices in several decisions, some of which do not comply with these guidelines. This study aims to determine the quality of the decision structure and the impact of applying the provisions in SKKMA Number 359/KMA/SK/XII/2022 on justice and legal certainty in default lawsuit decisions. This study uses a normative legal method with a statutory, conceptual, and case approach. The study results show that of the 12 decisions studied, almost 90% of the decisions did not comply with the guidelines in the decision letter. The inconsistency of the general standard context, including those related to writing numbers, dates, times, percentages, and currency symbols, to the use of underscores, italics, colons, and quotation marks. Meanwhile, regarding the format of the contents of the verdict, 90% of it is a discrepancy related to the head of the verdict and the irah-irah, identity, to the case. Therefore, the above problems will certainly impact legal uncertainty for the parties, especially regarding ununiform and incomplete legal considerations. The author suggests that supervision and mandatory socialization are needed to ensure the conformity of the judge's decision with SKKMA Number 359/KMA/SK/XII/2022. Non-conformity from the context of general standards, which includes writing numbers, dates, times, percentages, and currency symbols, to the use of underscores, italics, colons, and quotation marks.