TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN PUTUSAN REHABILITASI BAGI PECANDU NARKOTIKA DAN PSIKOTROPIKA(STUDI TENTANG PENERAPAN PASAL 41 UU NO. 5 TAHUN 1997 TENTANG PSIKOTROPIKA JO 47 UU NO. 22 TAHUN 1997 TENTANG NARKOTIKA DI KEJAKSAAN MALANG)

Ali Umar, Setiyaka (2008) TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN PUTUSAN REHABILITASI BAGI PECANDU NARKOTIKA DAN PSIKOTROPIKA(STUDI TENTANG PENERAPAN PASAL 41 UU NO. 5 TAHUN 1997 TENTANG PSIKOTROPIKA JO 47 UU NO. 22 TAHUN 1997 TENTANG NARKOTIKA DI KEJAKSAAN MALANG). Other thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.

[img]
Preview
Text
Tinjauan_Yuridis_Terhadap_Pelaksanaan.pdf

Download (152kB) | Preview

Abstract

Execution of decision of rehabilitation to be punished by Narcotic and of Psikotopika not yet as according to Section 41 and 47 Code of No 5 Year 1997 about Psikotropika and Narcotic. Where consumer of psikotropika which suffering sindroma depended related to area doing an injustice of psikotropika can be commanded by judge judging the case of the to experience treatment or medication and set mind on to command pertinent experience treatment or medication, if consumer of the narcotic proven make a mistake to do/conduct Narcotic doing an injustice and of Psikotropika. A period of/to experiencing treatment or medication to consumer of Narcotic and of Psikotropika reckoned as a period of/to serving time. Leave from the problems hence researcher interest to express furthermore into research form which is poured in title “Evaluate Yuridis To Execution Of Decision Rehabilitate To Consumer Narcotic and of Psikotropika” (Study About Applying of Section 41 UU No 5 Year 1997 About Psikotropika Jo 47 UU No 22 Year 1997 About Narcotic in Malang Public Attorney). As for intention of this research is how execution of decision rehabilitates to arsonist of Narcotic and of Psikotropika and constraints what there is in execution of decision rehabilitate. Result of this research mention that execution of decision rehabilitate to arsonist of Narcotic and of Psikotropika conducted on the basis of law of UU No. 5 Year 1997 and UU No. 22 Year 1997 about medical rehabilitate and rehabilitate social through decision rehabilitate to all costumer of and narcotic of psikotropika proven contempt of court where in execution rehabilitate him through some step like its it perception, recognition, and research of environment at longest 1 (month one). Planning of program construction of independence and personality. Execution of program construction of independence and personality. Assessment of execution of program construction of early stage. Later; Then registration like registration about identity, bundles of police, bundles of justice and also bind justice decision which have had legal force remain to be, penalization llama, brought goods, conducted crime type, location of cell and inspection of health. Existing constraint in execution of decision rehabilitate this have to seen as a psychological cure (head) the defendant in this case is costumer of NAZA if is true there is indication as costumer hence decision process rehabilitate can be decided also have to remain to pay attention some other law aspect in decision making. The limited amount of commissioned medical therapy and psychology in institute society of convict case of narkoba there is no. Special room rehabilitate there no. Society outside institute of society From other side that psychological construction system of convict of narkoba, hence in construction require to pay attention environmental situation of construction place, psychological of constructed convict, because this is matter very determining result of construction to convict.

Item Type: Thesis (Other)
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Law > Department of Law
Depositing User: Anggit Aldila
Date Deposited: 28 Apr 2012 02:43
Last Modified: 28 Apr 2012 02:43
URI: http://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/3249

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item