TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN KASASI MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 31/SAL.KEP./2005 DALAM KASUS PELANGGARAN HAKCIPTA PROPOSAL DESKRIPSI TEKNIKAL PENGGANTIAN KATALIS DIKILANG PERTAMINA UPVIBALONGAN

SYAFRIL, SOFYAN (2009) TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN KASASI MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 31/SAL.KEP./2005 DALAM KASUS PELANGGARAN HAKCIPTA PROPOSAL DESKRIPSI TEKNIKAL PENGGANTIAN KATALIS DIKILANG PERTAMINA UPVIBALONGAN. Other thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.

[img]
Preview
Text
TINJAUAN_YURIDIS_TERHADAP_PUTUSAN_KASASI.pdf

Download (146kB) | Preview

Abstract

The problem of copyright has significant relation with the business world. Therefore, it’s not surprising if those business leaders would give out lots of fund to do research and development from results that already exist. The objectives of those research is to found out what is actually needed by the society, or done a technology-based research, with expectation that someday it could be sold into the market. Copyright Law Number 19 Year 2002 (UUHC) has given warranty using legal protection for creators and relevant copyright holder to use, to copy and to sell the creation product, but UUHC is not explicitly suggest a proposal as a protected subject, though writing a technical proposal need creativity and reasioning. Based on brief explanation above, the writer has taken interest in observing juridical review toward Supreme Court decision in copyright violation case of technical description of catalyst substitution proposal in Pertamina’s Petroleum Mill UP-VI Balongan. In this kind of situation, creativity is highly demanded from those business those business actors, inventors and creators which give rise to creation product in which having value to be sold. Those creation products has both economical values and juridical implication. Legal relation meant is right embedded in the creation product for stakeholder, wheather it is moral right and economical right. Type of this experiment is normative legal research, a legal written form which contains testing, reviewing, analyzing, comparing or synchronizing laws/norms of legislation. It’s data collection technique is using primary data in the form of derivatives data of supreme court (MA) decision and UUHC, secondary data use is literatures/supporting books and tertiary data in use is articles from mass media and internet.

Item Type: Thesis (Other)
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Law > Department of Law
Depositing User: Anggit Aldila
Date Deposited: 03 Jul 2012 03:21
Last Modified: 03 Jul 2012 03:21
URI: http://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/10687

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item