ANALISISB YURIDIS PERTANGGUNG JAWABAN PIDANA TINDAKAN KEJAHATAN KESUSILAAN YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH ANAK DIBAWAH UMUR : STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 3/PID.SUS-ANAK/2020/PT KDI

In the case of a child who commits a crime of morality in casu Decision
Number 3/PID.SUS-Anak/2020/PT KDI, the child's criminal responsibility is not enough if it is only based on material law as regulated in the Criminal Code, through article 103 of the Criminal Code which reads: " The provisions inChapters I to Chapter VIII of this book apply to regulations which, according toother statutory provisions, constitute a criminal offense unless the law provides otherwise." The problems discussed in this research are 1) Criminal Responsibility for Moral Crimes committed by Minors in casu Decision Number
3/PID.SUS-Anak/2020/PT KDI? 2) What is the Juridical Analysis used by the Panel of Judges in providing Legal Considerations for Deciding Cases of Crimes of Morality by Minors in Decision Number 3/PID.SUS-Anak/2020/PT KDI? The aim of the research is to find out and explain the criminal responsibility of minorsand the judge's considerations in handing down decisions in case of Decision Number 3/PID.SUS-Anak/2020/PT KDI. The method used in this research is normative juridical with techniques for collecting library study materials according to the statutory regulatory approach. The conclusion and suggestion
from this writing is that In case a quo decision number 3/PID.SUS-Anak/2020/PT KDI it was found that a child who was in conflict with the law/perpetrator (MAS'UD Bin UDIN) committed immoral acts against the child who was the victim namely (AZZAHRA LESTALUHU) was influenced by delinquency. In casu a quo decision number 3/PID.SUS-Anak/2020/PT KDI it was discovered that the
PT KDI panel of judges in providing their legal considerations did not reflect
legal certainty and justice to the victim, because they did not pay attention to thefacts law (chronology of the case) as well as the imposition of criminal sanctions