ANALISIS PUTUSAN NOMOR 90/PUU-XXI/2023 UJI MATERI PASAL 169 HURUF q UU NOMOR 7 TAHUN 2017 TENTANG PEMILIHAN UMUM TERHADAP UUD NRI TAHUN 1945 DITINJAU DARI ASPEK KEADILAN

Elections are the embodiment of the administration of democratic principles, the constitutional court following an amendment to test the constitution against the constitution of the republic of Indonesia in 1945. This paper is designed to find out and analyze the constitutional court ruling number 90/ puu-xxi /2023 of the 169 letter no. 7 article 2017 article of material testing of the 169 letter no. 7 article of the 2017 general election on the issue of justice because there are some matters in consideration of the decision making that have been issued that don't satisfy the sense of justice. As for the method used in writing this final task, it isa normatif research method using the law collection technique used in this analysis: the Internet based on the publications of trusted sources, its laws and derivatives, the books that correspond to the writing of this study. Results and discussion: 1. Constitutional court ruling number 90/ puu-xxi /2023 on material test article 169 the letter q bill number 7 of 2017 on public elections provides a basis for a judge's consideration for a ruling based on a judge's jurisdiction normative, 2. Constitutional court ruling number 90/ puu-xxi /2023 on material test article 169 the letter q bill number 7 of 2017 does not meet the principle of justice based on Aristotle's. The conclusion of this writing is that the basis which the judge has considered to have a line and reason and has already been made into a verdict read in the pleno hearing, and the verdict with amar was ruled by allowing some to see from the standpoint of Aristotle's theory of justice that the judge had not fully fulfilled the sense of justice asa country with a democratic system of government.