ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAJELIS HAKIM MENOLAK PERMOHONAN CERAI TALAK AKIBAT PERNYATAAN SAKSI SALING BERTOLAK BELAKANG YANG MENYEBABKAN TIMBULNYA ASAS UNUS TESTIS NULLUS TESTIS

In writing this final assignment, the author examines the verdict in the Divorce and Talak case, which was decided at the Malang Regency Class 1A Religious Court, which adjudicated Divorce Divorce Case Number 2163/Pdt. G/2023/PA.Kab.Mlg. The decision in this case rejected the divorce petition submitted by the petitioner on the basis that the statements of the witnesses presented by the petitioner contradicted each other's statements during the evidence, so that only one witness was deemed to know the problems faced by the petitioner and the respondent. By using the principle of "Unus Testis Nullus Testis" as a consideration and stating that only 1 witness is deemed to be known by the applicant, while there are 2 witnesses presented by the applicant, there is 1 witness who is deemed not to know about the dispute in the house. Petitioner and Defendant Steps. Therefore, the author is interested in raising this issue with the title "Judicial Analysis of the Decision of the Panel of Judges Rejecting the Application for Divorce and Divorce Due to Conflicting Witness Statements Which Cause the Principle of "Unus Testis Nullus Testis" to emerge as research material for the author based on the experience of the author who has followed the agenda. The trial and preparation of files in this case are used as material for analysis.