ANALISIS YURIDIS TAHAPAN PENYUSUNAN PUTUSAN HAKIM PENGADILAN AGAMA MOJOKERTO TENTANG PEMBATALAN PERKAWINAN (Studi Putusan No. 1674/Pdt.G/2023/PA. Mr)

Sari, Felisyah Herlinda (2024) ANALISIS YURIDIS TAHAPAN PENYUSUNAN PUTUSAN HAKIM PENGADILAN AGAMA MOJOKERTO TENTANG PEMBATALAN PERKAWINAN (Studi Putusan No. 1674/Pdt.G/2023/PA. Mr). Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.

[thumbnail of PENDAHULUAN.pdf]
Preview
Text
PENDAHULUAN.pdf

Download (582kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of BAB I.pdf]
Preview
Text
BAB I.pdf

Download (156kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of BAB II.pdf]
Preview
Text
BAB II.pdf

Download (619kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of BAB III.pdf] Text
BAB III.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (335kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of BAB IV.pdf] Text
BAB IV.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (64kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of Lampiran...pdf] Text
Lampiran...pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (19MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The procedural implementation of Civil Procedure Law at the first level involves stages like filing a lawsuit, responding, presenting counterarguments, providing evidence, concluding, and issuing a judgment. Field research focused on case 1674/Pdt.G/2023/PA. Mr., an annulment case with the plaintiff NF and late defendant HS. NF sought annulment due to a formal defect in the marriage certification between HS and the defendant, unknown to NF as HS's legal wife. The socio-legal research method used data from an internship at Oke Law Firm | eko & co and literature. The resolution process includes special power delegation, lawsuit filing, response, and final judgment.
In the court context, the study highlights inconsistencies between procedural law and judges' decisions, especially in negligence during trial procedures not aligned with Civil Procedure Law. Differences in legal consequences between legal considerations and judges' decisions create inconsistency. Further assessment, particularly regarding evidence procedures not complying with civil procedure law, can be evaluated by the Supreme Court Supervisory Board. The examination aims to ensure integrity, fairness, and legal certainty in judgments. It verifies that the evidentiary process aligns with regulations.

Item Type: Thesis (Undergraduate)
Student ID: 202010110311281
Keywords: Marriage Annulment, Judges' Decision, Civil Law Procedure.
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Law > Department of Law (74201)
Depositing User: 202010110311281 felisyahherlindasari
Date Deposited: 12 Feb 2024 09:41
Last Modified: 13 Feb 2024 03:25
URI: https://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/3686

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item