Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa Pebuatan Melawan Hukum Terhadap Akta Jual Beli Perkara Nomor 34/PDT.G/2023/PN.KPN

In case number 34/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Kpn where there was a sale and purchase
deed and a certificate of ownership held by the defendant but the plaintiff
never felt that there was any sale and purchase agreement with the defendant.
This gave rise to a dispute between the two parties even though the sale and
purchase deed was drawn up 36 years ago. The main aim of the author in
studying this case is to find out how the process of resolving a dispute over an
unlawful act regarding the sale and purchase deed. The author also wants to
examine how the judge considers when deciding a case. The research method
used is empirical juridical with the type of case study of court decisions. The
results of the research show that the panel of judges who examined, decided
and adjudicated case number 34/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Kpn., granted the plaintiff's
claim to state that the defendant had committed an unlawful act, in his
consideration the judge stated that the defendant had acted with no intention.
good towards the land because there is uncertainty in the sale and purchase
deed document attached by the defendant. The judge considered that the
expiry period for control of land or the expiry period for a civil case must be
set aside because the judge did not find details or appropriate time references
for land to be considered abandoned and can be controlled by someone
without being contested. The author provides suggestions so that judges can
be careful and clear in interpreting a law because a law is a legal opinion that
judges should not ignore.