TINJAUAN YURIDIS PUTUSAN GUGATAN PERKARA NOMOR 1746/PDT.G/2023/PA.MLG

Nisar, Andi Wahyu Ryan (2024) TINJAUAN YURIDIS PUTUSAN GUGATAN PERKARA NOMOR 1746/PDT.G/2023/PA.MLG. Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.

[thumbnail of PENDAHULUAN.pdf]
Preview
Text
PENDAHULUAN.pdf

Download (1MB) | Preview
[thumbnail of BAB I.pdf]
Preview
Text
BAB I.pdf

Download (354kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of BAB II.pdf]
Preview
Text
BAB II.pdf

Download (590kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of BAB III.pdf] Text
BAB III.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (482kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of BAB IV.pdf] Text
BAB IV.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (176kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of LAMPIRAN.pdf] Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (5MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The background for writing the final assignment is to fulfill the requirements for passing the CoE internship. And also this writing was written as material to meet the graduation standards for obtaining a Bachelor of Laws degree. The purpose of writing is to find out the implementation of what has been mandated by the constitution, namely that Indonesia is a country of laws, the law must touch all aspects and lines of human life and livelihood, even into the family room. This is reinforced by a legal adage which states thatthere is a company right there, which means where there is law, there is society.
The type of research used in writing this final assignment is Empirical Juridical Legal Research with an approach methodlegal partnerwhich is in the nature of legal research regarding the application or implementation of normative legal provisionsin action on each specific legal event that occurs in society to obtain research data.
The results of the research conducted by the author show how the author here plays a role in following the entire settlement process and analyzing the process in trials in the realm of civil law, namely divorce lawsuits while the author was an intern. And it can be concluded that finally the case studied by the author was decided by a panel of judges with legal considerations in accordance with the plaintiff's arguments and the evidence submitted as well as the existing legal facts so that the judge decided in verstek because the Defendant did not heed the official and proper summons during 2 (two) trials.

Item Type: Thesis (Undergraduate)
Student ID: 202010110311573
Keywords: Constitution, Indonesia, Law, Juridical, Cases.
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Law > Department of Law (74201)
Depositing User: 202010110311573 andiwahyuryannisar
Date Deposited: 29 Jan 2024 09:16
Last Modified: 29 Jan 2024 09:16
URI: https://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/3072

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item