PENYELESAIAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN TERHADAP ANAK PADA NOMOR REGISTRASI PERKARA 562/PID SUS/2023/PT SBY.

In writing this final assignment, the author discusses the implementation of the process for resolving cases of criminal acts of violence against children on the case registration number (Case Decision Study Number 562/pid.sus/2023PT SBY). The purpose of this research is to determine and analyze the implementation of the resolution of cases of criminal acts of violence against children in case registration number 562/pid.sus/2023PT SBY. The research carried out to discuss the problems in this writing is by using a type of juridical empirical juridical research, using primary, secondary and tertiary data. With data processing techniques, namely analysis. So, the results of the research are as follows: Violence is an act or deed carried out by a child which is considered contrary to the legal provisions in force in a country and which the community itself perceives and interprets as a disgraceful act. The Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law does not explain the meaning of juvenile criminal acts, but only what the juvenile criminal justice system consists of. The process of resolving violent criminal cases is in accordance with applicable regulations, because mediation has previously been taken, which was previously carried out at the Batu Police Station. on June 29 2022. Based on decision number 562/PID.SUS/2023/PT SBY, there are several things that can be analyzed regarding the resolution of this case. First, there is information that the Public Prosecutor and the Defendant's Legal Counsel have submitted an appeal request within the time limit and carried out in the manner and conditions as determined in the Law, so that the appeal request can formally be accepted. In addition, the High Court Panel of Judges examined and carefully examined the case files along with the official derivative of the decision of the Malang District Court, and is of the opinion that the legal considerations of the First Level Panel of Judges in their decision were based on appropriate reasons and are correct according to law, so that the decision of the Malang District Court can be maintained and strengthened. However, there is also information that The Public Prosecutor and the Defendant's Legal Counsel filed an appeal on the grounds of asking for relief because the defendant had admitted his guilt. This shows that there are several aspects that need to be considered regarding the judge's decision process so that an appeal can be submitted and the reasons submitted must be clear