Putrijayagni, Adella Azizah Maharani (2025) AKIBAT HUKUM TERKAIT PUTUSAN YANG DINYATAKAN NIET ONTVANKELIJKE VERKLAARD (NO) DALAM GUGATAN CLASS ACTION PERKARA GANTI RUGI HAK ATAS TANAH UNTUK KEPENTINGAN UMUM (Studi Putusan Nomor 12/Pdt.G/2021/PN Srl). Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.
PENDAHULUAN.pdf
Download (3MB) | Preview
BAB I.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (347kB) | Request a copy
BAB II.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (429kB) | Request a copy
BAB III.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (373kB) | Request a copy
BAB IV.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (267kB) | Request a copy
Abstract
In the Sarolangun District Court Decision Number 12/Pdt.G/2021/PN Slw, the judge examining the case stated that the lawsuit filed by the Plaintiffs was invalid and unacceptable. The judge's reasoning for reaching his decision was based on the judge's consideration that the class action lawsuit filed by the Plaintiffs did not meet the criteria as outlined in PERMA No. 1 of 2002. The result of the author's analysis in the settlement of this class action lawsuit case in the verdict handed down by the judge is
that it is not appropriate, because the Plaintiffs have fulfilled PERMA No. 1 of 2002 because this research was made with the aim of knowing and analyzing the judge's considerations and analyzing the consequences or legal consequences arising in Court
Decision Number 12/Pdt.G/2021/PN Srl which was declared Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard (NO) in a class action lawsuit for compensation of land rights for the public interest. The type of research used is juridical-normative. While the legal material
collection technique used is a literature study through data collection or legal materials with literature studies with primary and secondary materials. The results of the author's research are that the judge did not fully consider referring to PERMA No. 1 of 2002 and the legal consequences that emerged were that the examination of the class action lawsuit was stopped and the losing party (the plaintiff) was sentenced to pay court costs and could re-register a new lawsuit with the same material. The advice from the author is that judges need to pay full attention to the consideration of the case and the terms of the class action lawsuit which have been regulated in PERMA Number 1 of 2002 and the Plaintiffs can file a new lawsuit with the same material by improving the formalities considered by the panel of judges to the Sarolangun High Court.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Undergraduate) |
|---|---|
| Student ID: | 202110110311500 |
| Keywords: | Compensation; Class Action Lawsuit: Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard |
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Law > Department of Law (74201) |
| Depositing User: | 202110110311500 adellaamputrijayagni |
| Date Deposited: | 20 Mar 2025 07:04 |
| Last Modified: | 20 Mar 2025 07:04 |
| URI: | https://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/16346 |
