ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENJATUHKAN VONIS TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN DISERTAI MUTILASI DENGAN NOMOR REGISTER PERKARA: 124/Pid.B/2024/PN.MLG

Indonesia as a country of law, upholds the principles or principles of criminal law in every judge's decision such as: the principle of legality, the principle of justice and the principle of proposinolitas with the aim of ensuring that the decisions taken are in accordance with applicable rules and reflect justice for the parties. Therefore, before passing a verdict or decision, the Panel of Judges needs to consider and explore all aspects of a case. Based on the description above, the Author is interested in analyzing the judge's considerations in passing a verdict on the perpetrator of the crime of murder accompanied by mutilation with case registration number: 124 / Pid.b / 2024 / PN.MLG. The research method used in conducting this research is using the empirical legal method. The empirical legal method is a research method used by the Author by analyzing and compiling a study that will be carried out in order to obtain data in the field. Based on the research results obtained by the Author from a series of trials in a murder case accompanied by mutilation with case registration number: 124 / Pid.B / 2024 / PN.MLG, namely that before issuing a verdict, the Panel of Judges has considered all sides, both from legal and non-legal aspects. Based on the description above, the Panel of Judges is expected to be able to provide justice for both parties, both the victim and the perpetrator. In addition, in this case, the government is expected to be able to create special regulations regarding mutilation so that the imposition of punishment for the perpetrator can provide a sense of justice and benefit.