PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DALAM GUGATAN PERBUATAN MELANGGAR HUKUM PADA PERKARA PERDATA NOMOR 102/PDT.G/2024/PN.KPN

The aim of writing this final report is to analyze and identify the process of resolving a tort lawsuit dispute along with the legal considerations of the Panel of Judges. The methods use are empirical juridical methods that emphasize the study of legal phenomenon. The author uses primary legal materials in the form of decision number 102/Pdt.G/2024/PN.Kpn and interview with the advocates who directly handling this case, as well as secondary and tertiary legal materials to support primary data. The writing of the final project discusses the process of resolving the dispute a quo and analyzing the legal considerations of the examining judges. The process of resolving the dispute a quo, carried out from the granting of power of attorney, mediation, to the litigation process until the reading of the decision by the examining Panel of Judges was in accordance with the law of the case. The decision by the examining panel of judges was to deny the Respondent’s exception in its entirety, deny the Plaintiff’s claim in its entirety, and order the Plaintiff to pay court cost. Analysis of the legal considerations of the Panel of Judges against the Plaintiff’s Lawsuit Less Parties who did not withdraw the Seller of the object of dispute as a litigant. In Addition, the evidence submitted by the plaintiff which the judge did not consider was not considered as absolute ownership, but was preliminary that needed to be supported by other evidence. Furthermore, the analysis of the legal considerations of the Panel of Judges regarding the process of transferring rights and issuing certificates to the Respondent has gone through the applicable procedures and laws, so the Respondent did not commit an unlawful act.