ANALISIS KOMPARATIF BIAYA DAN PENERIMAAN BUDIDAYA APEL (Malus syvestriss Mill) ANTARA PENGGUNA DAN NON PENGGUNA PUPUK ORGANIK “BIOGREEN” (Studi kasus di Desa Kayukebek Kecamatan Tutur Kabupaten Pasuruan)

DWI AGUSTINING TYAS, SOVI (2007) ANALISIS KOMPARATIF BIAYA DAN PENERIMAAN BUDIDAYA APEL (Malus syvestriss Mill) ANTARA PENGGUNA DAN NON PENGGUNA PUPUK ORGANIK “BIOGREEN” (Studi kasus di Desa Kayukebek Kecamatan Tutur Kabupaten Pasuruan). Other thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.

[img]
Preview
Text
ANALISIS_KOMPARATIF_BIAYA_DAN_PENERIMAAN_BUDIDAYA_APE1.pdf

Download (97kB) | Preview

Abstract

Prospect development of usage of organic manure as penyeimbang of usage of manure of an-organik good enough (it) is true, considering these days price fertilize an-organik which continue to bounce up. Besides, usage of continuous organic manure can affect positive to.In general farmer of Indonesia specially farmer of apple exist in region of Pasuruan ( Nongkojajar) and its surroundings, representing farmer using manure of an-organik in course of its production. Nevertheless, there [is] also using organic manure ( organic manure [of] Biogreen) in addition from manure of an-organik. Besides usage of cage manure, farmer of apple [in] Countryside of Kayukebek also use organic manure [of] Biogreen.fertility of land;ground. From research which have been [done/conducted], indicating that there are some different expense [of] its its[his] big reality [among/between] farmer of consumer and non consumer of organic manure [of] biogreen. The costs for example Expense of pesticide, expense of manure of an organic [is] Expense of TK prapanen, expense of equipments, and total cost. Total cost which [is] dikelurkan farmer of consumer of organic manure [of] Biogreen equal to Rp 12.095.924,31 during once production process. While total expense [of] farmer of[is non consumer of organic manure [of] Biogreen equal to Rp 17.418.896,41. obtained [by] Mean production farmer of consumer of organic manure [of] Biogreen counted 9.868,99 singk/ 750 tree, with price mean equal to 2.802 / singk. While farmer of[is non consumer of organic manure [of] Biogreen produce mean which [is] diperolah counted 11.185,52 singk / 750 tree, at the price of mean 2.548,81 / singk. Become can be seen with usage of organic manure [of] yielded [to] Production Biogreen lower but quality of crop which [is] better diperolah, so that given price [is] higher the than farmer which [do] not use organic manure [of] Biogreen. Result of examination of hypothesis use test of t, pursuant to comparison [among/between] t [count/calculate] with t of[is tables of got [by] value of t [count/calculate] equal to - 1,001 , while t of[is tables of with trust level 5 % obtained [by] t of[is tables of equal to 1,676. Meaning value of t [count/calculate] < t of[is tables of , so that its conclusion [of] H0 accepted, hence acceptance mean accepted by farmer of consumer of organic manure [of] Biogreen and farmer of[is non consumer of organic manure [of] Biogreen [there] no difference of obtained acceptance There are some weakness and excellence of organic manure [of] Biogreen. Excellence of organic manure [of] Biogreen [is] earning memperingan of[is expense of, growth to good bydm soriyt and leaf, improve;repairing land;ground structure, its [of] cheap him etc, and also weakness of organic manure [of] Biogreen [is] respon to tardy crop, its aroma is not delicious, etc.

Item Type: Thesis (Other)
Subjects: S Agriculture > S Agriculture (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Agriculture & Animal Husbandry > Department of Agribusiness
Depositing User: Zainul Afandi
Date Deposited: 09 May 2012 06:13
Last Modified: 09 May 2012 06:13
URI: http://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/4872

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item