ANALISA YURIDIS PUTUSAN HAKIM PADA PERKARA PENCURIAN PEMBERATAN DENGAN TERDAKWA ANAK (Tinjauan Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Malang Nomor: 586/Pid.B./2008/P.N. Mlg Tentang Pencurian Pemberatan Dengan Terdakwa Andi Saputro)

TAUFAN ADHI NUGROHO, IKRIMAH (2009) ANALISA YURIDIS PUTUSAN HAKIM PADA PERKARA PENCURIAN PEMBERATAN DENGAN TERDAKWA ANAK (Tinjauan Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Malang Nomor: 586/Pid.B./2008/P.N. Mlg Tentang Pencurian Pemberatan Dengan Terdakwa Andi Saputro). Other thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.

[img]
Preview
Text
ANALISA_YURIDIS_PUTUSAN_HAKIM_PADA_PERKARA_PENCURIAN.pdf

Download (150kB) | Preview

Abstract

Study object in this experiment is about adjudication about stealing crime act with children defendant (Andi Saputro). Adjudication is the peak of court process who decide whether the defendant is found guilty or not in court. Author would like to reveal issues on adjudication number: 586/Pid.B./2008/P.N. Mlg which decide 6 (six) month sentence in prison toward the defendant Andi Saputro has accorded to legal aspect, justice aspect, benefit aspect and progressivity of verdict aspect. The experiment used normative juridical writing method. Legal material used are primary legal material, such as; KUHAP, KUHP, Judicial Power Statute, Children Court Statute, Children Protection Statute, Civil Rights Statute and Adjudication in State Court of Malang No: 586/Pid.B./2008/P.N. Mlg. Secondary legal material such as books, journals, magazines, internet, articles. Tertiary legal material used such as dictionaries and encyclopedias. Through this writing, the result is adjudication of State Court of Malang is not in mutual accord with formal legal aspect, because it didn’t meet the requirement in Article 59 subsection (2) Children Court Statute. Justice aspect for the defendant is not meet, justice are only felt by the victim and the society. From beneficial aspect, sentence for children should be given away from jail and giving more educated punishment for his/her future. From the progressivity of verdict, judge didn’t paying attention toward Children Protection Statute and Civil Rights Statute, which says clearly that children sentenced to prison, is done as the last resort. Author could conclude that during examining and decide the verdict, judge didn’t paying attention toward Children Court Statute as the procedure of law besides the Procedure of Criminal Law.

Item Type: Thesis (Other)
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Law > Department of Law
Depositing User: Anggit Aldila
Date Deposited: 05 Jul 2012 02:23
Last Modified: 05 Jul 2012 02:23
URI: http://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/11032

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item