KEWENANGAN PENGADILAN NEGERI DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA GUGATAN PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM DARI PROSES LELANG AKIBAT KEPAILITAN PERKARA NOMOR 63/PDT.G/2025/PN MLG.

The condition where the Debtor experiences bankruptcy and the process of settling the debtor's assets often experience many disputes. The dispute experienced is not far from the problem between the Debtor and the Creditor and a Curator, or even the involvement of a Third Party. This problem is often followed by the emergence of other new lawsuits with the object of the lawsuit that is still correlated with the bankruptcy process. One example is an Unlawful Acts Lawsuit filed by a third party in case Number 63/Pdt.G/2025/PN Mlg. The lawsuit is included in a lawsuit that still has an attachment to bankruptcy cases, where the lawsuit should be filed at the Commercial Court which has the authority to examine and adjudicate bankruptcy cases. However, in fact, the Plaintiff filed the lawsuit in the Malang District Court. So, using the empirical juridical research method, the researcher conducted research on the process of settling lawsuits for unlawful acts on the implementation of bankruptcy property auctions and the position of the District Court in examining and adjudicating the lawsuit. The results of this study revealed that the case had been decided by granting the absolute competency exception of the Defendant and stating that the Malang District Court was not authorized to adjudicate the case a quo.