PELAKSANAAN EKSEKUSI PIDANA MATI DI INDONESIA (TINJAUAN KRITIS TERHADAP KEADILAN HUKUM DENGAN MENGACU PADA PASAL 100 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2023 KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA (KUHP) BARU)

This study compares principles of justice in the imposition of the death penalty under Singapore’s mandatory death penalty regime and Indonesia’s conditional capital punishment with a ten-year probationary period as stipulated in Article 100 of Law No. 1 of 2023 (Criminal Code). The research background highlights the contrast between Singapore’s legal certainty and Indonesia’s rehabilitative orientation coupled with procedural ambiguity. The research question examines how both models satisfy substantive justice, procedural fairness, and legal certainty. Employing a doctrinal legal (yuridical-normative) approach, the study analyzes statutes, jurisprudence, and conceptual frameworks to assess Article 100’s implementation and comparative practices. Findings indicate that Singapore’s model performs better in predictability and enforcement consistency but is criticized for limited individualization and mitigation considerations; Indonesia’s model provides rehabilitative opportunities and a humane rationale but risks inconsistent application, subjective assessments, and prolonged death-row phenomena. The study recommends detailed implementing regulations and measurable evaluation criteria for Article 100 and suggests importing procedural-certainty practices from Singapore while safeguarding human rights protections.