Prahmana, Lutfi Alawy (2024) ANALISIS KEABSAHAN KOMPETENSI RELATIF GUGATAN TERHADAP KANTOR CABANG PT.ANGKASA PURA (Studi Terhadap Putusan Nomor 132/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Sda). Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.
PENDAHULUAN.pdf
Download (1MB) | Preview
BAB 1.pdf
Download (646kB) | Preview
BAB 2.pdf
Download (547kB) | Preview
BAB 3.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (597kB) | Request a copy
BAB 4.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (300kB) | Request a copy
LAMPIRAN.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (1MB) | Request a copy
Abstract
One of the principles in civil procedural law for determining relative competence is the Actor Sequitur forum rei which confirms that a lawsuit must be filed at the defendant's residence or if it is a legal entity it is filed at the legal entity's domicile. However, on the other hand, there is a hope for simple, fast and low-cost justice which requires trials to be carried out with the principles of convenience and efficiency. Of course, this is a big problem for the fulfillment and development of relative competence in suing Limited Liability Company branch offices. Especially in carrying out the hope of simple, fast and low-cost justice. In this case, there is a Sidoarjo District Court Decision Number 132/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Sda which allows and states that the lawsuit against the branch office does not violate the relative competency provisions as stated in Article 118 paragraph (1) HIR. Therefore, the issues that will be studied in this paper are 1) Is the lawsuit against the branch office of PT. Angkasa Pura meets the elements of relative competency?;
2) What is the relevance of the validity of the relative competence of PT branch office lawsuits. Angkasa Pura reviewed the principles of simple, fast and low-cost justice in Decision Number 132/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Sda. The research method in this paper is to use a normative legal research type, using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. This research produces the first conclusion, filing a lawsuit against a branch office has validity and can be used as a basis for determining the relative competence of a court. Second, the relevance of the relative competence of lawsuits at limited liability company branch offices with the principles of simple, fast and low-cost justice apparently shows conditions that support each other. Lawsuits addressed to Limited Liability Company branch offices prioritize the principles of simple, fast and low-cost justice.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Undergraduate) |
|---|---|
| Student ID: | 201710110311142 |
| Keywords: | Relative Competency, Branch Offices, Fast Justice |
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Law > Department of Law (74201) |
| Depositing User: | 201710110311142 lutfialawy |
| Date Deposited: | 16 Sep 2025 04:17 |
| Last Modified: | 16 Sep 2025 04:17 |
| URI: | https://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/23578 |
