ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENOLAK TUNTUTAN PENCABUTAN HAK POLITIK TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR: 87/PID.SUS-TPK/2019/PN JKT.PST)

As explained in Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of
Corruption, it is explained that the revocation of political rights is included in
additional criminal penalties for suspects in non-corruption cases. An example of the application of this additional criminal sanction is in the decision Number: 87/Pid.Sus-TPK/2019/PN Jkt.Pst The Judge's Decision stating that Muchammad Romahurmuziy's political rights were only deactivated for 5 years, of course this is considered unfair and not commensurate with the losses that Muchammad Romahurmuziy has caused, If after 5 years, Muchammad Romahurmuziy can run as a people's representative, of course, it will be a big risk to public trust and there will be a possibility that corruption will occur again. This study aims to elaborate on the judge's negation considerations in decision number: 87 / Pid.Sus-TPK / 2019 / PN Jkt.Pst regarding the revocation of political rights from the perspective of the principle of justice. The methodology of this study is normative juridical. If after 5 years, Muchammad Romahurmuziy can run as a people's representative, of course, it will be a big risk to public trust and there will be a possibility that corruption will occur again, considering the lack of deterrent effect given to Muchammad Romahurmuziy. Impact on Legal Certainty and Public Trust Decisions that do not provide a deterrent effect risk reducing public trust in the justice system and law enforcement. In the context of legal certainty, the revocation of political rights for corruptors should be implemented more firmly in order to maintain the integrity of the government system. Suggestions to increase the effectiveness of law enforcement against corruption, especially regarding the revocation of political rights for perpetrators