TINJAUAN YURIDIS STUDI PERBANDINGAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DI INDONESIA DAN INGGRIS DITINJAU DARI SEGI HUKUM PIDANA

Restorative justice is an alternative approach in the criminal justice system that focuses on the recovery of both victims and offenders rather than mare punishment. Indonesia and the United Kingdom are two countries that implement this method within their legal systems. This study aims to analyze the application of restorative justice in both countries, with a particular focus on the legal review of its principles, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of its regulation in Indonesia’s criminal law. The research employs a normative juridical method with a comparative approach, comparing the legislation in Indonesia and the United Kingdom to understand the differences and similarities in the regulation and implementation of restorative justice. The findings indicate that Indonesia has flexibility in applying restorative justice but still faces challenges in terms of natinal standards and the understanding of law enforcement officers. Meanwhile, the United Kingdom has more comprehensive regulations and a well-structured oversight mechanism, countributing to its effective implementation. The study concludes that strengthening restorative justice regulations in Indonesia is essential for its optimal application. Standadizing procedures and enhancing the capacity of law enforcement officers are also key factors in ensuring effective implementation. By learning from the legal system in the United Kingdom, Indonesia can improve the professionalism and effectiveness of restorative justice within its national criminal justice system.