PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PEMEGANG HAK ATAS TANAH DENGAN ADANYA SERTIPIKAT GANDA (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor: 58/Pdt.G/2020/PN Kdi jo. Nomor 2241 K/Pdt/2022)

Fitri, Chofifah Aida (2025) PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PEMEGANG HAK ATAS TANAH DENGAN ADANYA SERTIPIKAT GANDA (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor: 58/Pdt.G/2020/PN Kdi jo. Nomor 2241 K/Pdt/2022). Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.

[thumbnail of Pendahuluan.pdf]
Preview
Text
Pendahuluan.pdf

Download (3MB) | Preview
[thumbnail of BAB I.pdf]
Preview
Text
BAB I.pdf

Download (307kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of BAB II .pdf]
Preview
Text
BAB II .pdf

Download (501kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of BAB III .pdf] Text
BAB III .pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (704kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of BAB IV.pdf] Text
BAB IV.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (88kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of Lampiran.pdf] Text
Lampiran.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (1MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The purepose of this research is to understanding the legal basis that judges use as considerations in deciding cases the holder of land rights with a double certificate knows the legal basis that is used as the basis for the judge's consideration in deciding the case and knows the legal protection for the holder of land rights with the double certificate. This type of research is normative juridical which uses a statue approach, using primary and secondary legal data sources related to double certificates. Land is considered valid if it has been registered with the National Land Office and will receive a certificate provided that it meets the documents specified by the National Land Office. Based on case no. 58/Pdt.G/2020/PN Kdi at the Kendari District Court in this case, the buyer was the owner of a plot of land. The land was obtained by legal sale and purchase, then the buyer was a buyer in good faith, carried out an SHM inspection at the land office, then the Defendant claimed the buyer's land with used a letter of proof of physical possession in 2007 and the Defendant filed a lawsuit in this process experiencing several procedural defects exceeding the time limit determined by the intervention of the Chief of Staff. Dispute Sarno is a convict in a corruption case by the Agency The land represented by Sarno did not take legal action so that the buyer could not defend his rights. This research concludes that the Double Certificate of Decision No. 58/Pdt.G/2020/PN Kdi which was carried out by the judge based on the provisions of the Basic Agrarian Law.

Item Type: Thesis (Undergraduate)
Student ID: 202010110311241
Keywords: Double Certificate, Legal Protection, District Court
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Law > Department of Law (74201)
Depositing User: 202010110311241 sf6263099
Date Deposited: 22 Jul 2025 02:00
Last Modified: 22 Jul 2025 02:00
URI: https://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/14081

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item