HARTANTO, AGUS (2008) Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pelapor Dan Saksitindak Pidana Korupsi. Other thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.
|
Text
Perlindungan_Hukum_Bagi_Pelapor_Dan_Saksitindak_Pidana_Korupsi.pdf Download (129kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Governmental intention fight corruption doing an injustice seen to pass Invitor- Invite Number 31 Year 1999 concerning Eradication Of Doing An Injustice Corruption. Governmental convince of efficacy of eradication of corruption doing an injustice, role require to and also society. According to section 41 sentence (1) mentioned society can share and also assist preventive effort and eradication act corruption. But In a number of cases, they who report corruption case anticipation exactly is also adjudged to make a mistake by justice with aspersion accusation. On the contrary, they who is anticipated do corruption doing an injustice checked not serious judicially. Worried of, when event like this recurring, society will shy at participate in the effort eradication of corruption. Problems which lifted in masterpiece write there is two that is how protection of law for corruption doing an injustice eyewitness and reporter according to positive law and whether corruption doing an injustice eyewitness and reporter can hit aspersion crime. Result of writing of this law lay open that protection of law for corruption doing an injustice eyewitness and reporter have been arranged at section 15 Law of Number 30 Year 2002, section 5 Regulation of Government of No 71 Year 2000 and section 10 Law of Number 13 Year 2006 can push role and also and society bravery to give witness and report to existence of corruption doing an injustice anticipation which was it is of course expected can assist to quicken eradication of difficult corruption which during the time done because the minim of evidence. But that way problems of arising out there is still in protection of law for and reporter of eyewitness as implementations of regulation of Law – invitor is including in it realize rights – reporter rights and eyewitness besides still to the number of eyewitness reporter of corruption case which was exactly informed against aspersion.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Other) |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Law > Department of Law (74201) |
| Depositing User: | Anggit Aldila |
| Date Deposited: | 07 May 2012 02:31 |
| Last Modified: | 07 May 2012 02:31 |
| URI : | http://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/4399 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
