ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN COMPUTATIONAL THINKING SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL HOTS OPEN ENDED DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF REFLEKTIF DAN IMPULSIF

Amanah, Nabilla Nur (2024) ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN COMPUTATIONAL THINKING SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL HOTS OPEN ENDED DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF REFLEKTIF DAN IMPULSIF. Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.

[thumbnail of PENDAHULUAN.pdf]
Preview
Text
PENDAHULUAN.pdf

Download (730kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of BAB I.pdf]
Preview
Text
BAB I.pdf

Download (228kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of BAB II.pdf]
Preview
Text
BAB II.pdf

Download (489kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of BAB III.pdf]
Preview
Text
BAB III.pdf

Download (396kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of BAB IV.pdf] Text
BAB IV.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (728kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of BAB V.pdf] Text
BAB V.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (212kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of LAMPIRAN.pdf] Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (4MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The ability of computational thinking is the ability needed to balance the development in the 21st century digitalization era. The purpose of this study was to describe the ability of students' computational thinking in solving open ended HOTS problems in terms of reflective and impulsive cognitive styles. This research is a descriptive research with qualitative approach with the research subjects are four students of class VIII SMP Muhammadiyah 1 Sumberpucung, namely two students with reflective cognitive style and two students with impulsive cognitive style. The results of this study found that the ability of computational thinking students with reflective cognitive style is in the high category while students with impulsive cognitive style in the medium category. R1 can fulfill the aspects of decomposition, pattern recognition, abstraction, and algorithm design but the solution obtained is not correct because it is less careful when working. R2 also fulfills all four aspects and the solution obtained is correct. I1 and I2 both could not fulfill the algorithm design aspect, but could fulfill the aspects of decomposition, pattern recognition, and abstraction even though they were still less precise.

Item Type: Thesis (Undergraduate)
Student ID: 202010060311024
Keywords: Computational thinking ability, open ended HOTS problems, reflective and impulsive cognitive styles
Subjects: L Education > L Education (General)
Q Science > QA Mathematics
Divisions: Faculty of Teacher Training and Education > Department of Mathematics Education (84202)
Depositing User: 202010060311024 nabillanuramanah1230
Date Deposited: 27 Mar 2024 05:36
Last Modified: 27 Mar 2024 05:36
URI: https://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/5221

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item