ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAJELIS HAKIM MENOLAK PERMOHONAN CERAI TALAK AKIBAT PERNYATAAN SAKSI SALING BERTOLAK BELAKANG YANG MENYEBABKAN TIMBULNYA ASAS UNUS TESTIS NULLUS TESTIS

Putri Azahra, Fania (2024) ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAJELIS HAKIM MENOLAK PERMOHONAN CERAI TALAK AKIBAT PERNYATAAN SAKSI SALING BERTOLAK BELAKANG YANG MENYEBABKAN TIMBULNYA ASAS UNUS TESTIS NULLUS TESTIS. Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.

[thumbnail of PENDAHULUAN(1).pdf]
Preview
Text
PENDAHULUAN(1).pdf

Download (1MB) | Preview
[thumbnail of BAB 1(2).pdf]
Preview
Text
BAB 1(2).pdf

Download (463kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of BAB 2(2).pdf]
Preview
Text
BAB 2(2).pdf

Download (316kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of BAB 3(3).pdf] Text
BAB 3(3).pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (468kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of BAB 4(4).pdf] Text
BAB 4(4).pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (178kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of LAMPIRAN (2).pdf] Text
LAMPIRAN (2).pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (9MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

In writing this final assignment, the author examines the verdict in the Divorce and Talak case, which was decided at the Malang Regency Class 1A Religious Court, which adjudicated Divorce Divorce Case Number 2163/Pdt. G/2023/PA.Kab.Mlg. The decision in this case rejected the divorce petition submitted by the petitioner on the basis that the statements of the witnesses presented by the petitioner contradicted each other's statements during the evidence, so that only one witness was deemed to know the problems faced by the petitioner and the respondent. By using the principle of "Unus Testis Nullus Testis" as a consideration and stating that only 1 witness is deemed to be known by the applicant, while there are 2 witnesses presented by the applicant, there is 1 witness who is deemed not to know about the dispute in the house. Petitioner and Defendant Steps. Therefore, the author is interested in raising this issue with the title "Judicial Analysis of the Decision of the Panel of Judges Rejecting the Application for Divorce and Divorce Due to Conflicting Witness Statements Which Cause the Principle of "Unus Testis Nullus Testis" to emerge as research material for the author based on the experience of the author who has followed the agenda. The trial and preparation of files in this case are used as material for analysis.

Item Type: Thesis (Undergraduate)
Student ID: 202010110311012
Keywords: Divorced, Witness, Unus Testis Nullus Testis.
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Law > Department of Law (74201)
Depositing User: 202010110311012 faniaptr12gmailcom
Date Deposited: 13 Feb 2024 05:12
Last Modified: 13 Feb 2024 05:12
URI: https://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/3855

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item