UPAYA HUKUM VERZET ATAS VERSTEK YANG TELAH DIPUTUS LEBIH DARI 9 TAHUN PADA GUGATAN NOMOR REGISTRASI 135/PDT.PLW/2013/PN.KPN

Devoutra, Rykyfirsta Shafa (2024) UPAYA HUKUM VERZET ATAS VERSTEK YANG TELAH DIPUTUS LEBIH DARI 9 TAHUN PADA GUGATAN NOMOR REGISTRASI 135/PDT.PLW/2013/PN.KPN. Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.

[thumbnail of PENDAHULUAN.pdf]
Preview
Text
PENDAHULUAN.pdf

Download (1MB) | Preview
[thumbnail of BAB I.pdf]
Preview
Text
BAB I.pdf

Download (395kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of BAB II.pdf]
Preview
Text
BAB II.pdf

Download (440kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of BAB III.pdf] Text
BAB III.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (424kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of BAB IV.pdf] Text
BAB IV.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (259kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

This research is motivated by the filing of a verzet lawsuit against verstek in case number 135/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Kpn, where the verstek decision has been decided for more than 9 years. This research aims to analyze verzet legal remedies for verstek that has passed the time limit for filing a Verzet Lawsuit. When reflecting on Article 129 HIR, of course, the Verzet Lawsuit is a little deviant, because the time limit for filing a Verzet Lawsuit against Verstek is 14 days after notification of the decision and or 8 days after the aanmaning. The research method conducted by the author is an empirical juridical research method with a socio legal approach. In this case, the author conducted interviews with legal counsel directly and was present in the field to follow the trial. The result of this research is that there is a legal deviation, in which the Panel of Judges accepts the filing of a Verzet Legal Action from the Plaintiff / Former Defendant. The filing of this Verzet has actually exceeded the time limit of the applicable rules. In addition to accepting the Verzet submission, the Panel of Judges also considered the Plaintiff to be the correct Plaintiff. In fact, if the filing of the Verzet has exceeded the time limit, it should be rejected / unacceptable. In addition, the Panel of Judges should have ruled and stated that the Complainant was an incorrect Complainant.

Item Type: Thesis (Undergraduate)
Student ID: 202010110311438
Keywords: Legal Remedies, Verzet, Verstek.
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Law > Department of Law (74201)
Depositing User: 202010110311438 rykyfirstaaasd
Date Deposited: 25 Jan 2024 04:32
Last Modified: 25 Jan 2024 04:32
URI: https://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/2985

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item