MAHDIANA, ANA (2009) TINJAUAN YURIDIS SOSIOLOGIS TERHADAP PENGRUSAKAN DAN PEMBAKARAN PERUSAHAAN STOCK FILE MALEWONG JAYA ABADI OLEH MASSA (Studi Ketidak patuhan Masyarakat di Desa Ujung Baru, Kabupaten Tanah Laut,kalimantan Selatan). Other thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.
Download (144Kb) | Preview
Destruction and burning of stocfile Malewong Jaya Abadi Company by Ujung Baru Villagers was a violence action which was done by mass, it showed that there was a law disobey of Ujung Baru villagers with all cause for the action The research was taken statement of problem as: (1) what factors caused the subject did the destruction and burning of Stockfile Malewong Jaya Abadi Company? (2) How the law application should be done to Stockfile Malewong Jaya Abadi Company by mass which was done by Ujung Baru villagers? (3) what problems faced by police to the destruction and burning of Stockfile Malewong Jaya Abadi Company by mass which was done by Ujung Baru villagers? The research used socio-juridical approach, data collection technique is interview with respondent/samples from population of subject and direct observation to the research location at Ujung Baru village, Bati-bati sub-district, Tanah Laut residence, South Kalimantan as primary data. The data analyzed in descriptive way. From 15 subject samples, who did the destruction and burning criminal, causal factor were: (a) emotion of the environment; (b) disappointment to police officer; (c) revenge to the victim’s family; (d) just follow. Law application should be applied was section 170 criminal law. But in law enforcement, it should be let go without any law process. The problem faced by police officer were: (a) personnel limitation; (b) witness; (c) mass arrangement; (d) improper prison. There could be concluded that the subject’s action who did destruction and burning were wrong since it was against law action which arranged in the statement of section 170 Criminal Law. It was violence action which was done in clear way and with power altogether to the properties done by mass, and the Police officer could do law processing to the processing and burning action. In order to reveal similar action, Police Officer should increase their ability in handling the case whether in law factor, law officer factor, facility factor, society factor, and culture factor which should be fulfilled since it has important connection in law enforcement and conclusion in discretion way by police officer was opposite action since it didn’t fit the reason in dangerous condition and for people importance as stated in section 16 and 18 Law No.2 / 2002 about Police Officer. It wasn’t fair since there were several parties who have loss and benefit for society or the subjects of the destruction and burning action.
|Item Type:||Thesis (Other)|
|Subjects:||K Law > K Law (General)|
|Divisions:||Faculty of Law > Department of Law|
|Depositing User:||Anggit Aldila|
|Date Deposited:||16 Jun 2012 03:32|
|Last Modified:||16 Jun 2012 03:32|
Actions (login required)