RUUM HADI, A. ROSYID (2008) ANALISA YURIDIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR: 30/SKLN-IV/2006 TENTANG SENGKETA KEWENANGAN ANTARA KOMISI PENYIARAN INDONESIA DENGAN PRESIDEN REPUBLIK INDONESIA Cq MENTERI KOMUNIKASI DAN INFORMASI. Other thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.
Download (93kB) | Preview
The Dispute of Authority between State institute in Indonesia not again become a new matter. dispute of Authority the frequent times; rill happened when an institute feel its have been taken over illegally by other institute. In Indonesia by it self, dispute of authority between State institute can be finished to through Constitution Court. But, institute State able to attend legal procedure in Constitution court only State institute which its born of Elementary Inviter. KPI as State institute which feel its have been meddled by Menkoinfo of giving broadcast frequency permission bring a lawsuit to the court to Constitution Court which tip at its exit of Court Constitution decision of No.30 / SKLN-IV / 2006 refusing suing of KPI of Menkoinfo and give wide of impact to each institute which is at law and also broadcasting world becoming dispute object of authority. This research take formula of[is problem of hitting: what becoming base consideration of Judge of MK in breaking dispute of authority between KPI with Menkoinfo and how decision implication of MK No.30 / SKLN-IV / 2006 to management of broadcasting in Indonesia. This research use method approach of Juridical normative, while its data collecting technique by conducting of bibliography / book study by based documentation of lifted problems from various used by law materials are primary goodness, secondary, and also is tertiary, where later can be registered elementary upon which in analyzing lifted problems. In this case related to Constitutional law specially about Analysis of juridical Normative To Decision Court Constitution Number: 30/SKLN-IV/2006 About Dispute of Authority Between KPI With President Republic Of Indonesia of cq Menkoinfo along with its implication to management of broadcasting in Indonesia. Later; Then data analyzed descriptively or Juridical. The Result of Research, dispute of authority concerning giving of radio broadcast frequency permission and television in area and also centered to be to be brought by KPI to Court Constitution desk because KPI assume its also born pursuant to Constitution. But, in conference, Judge of MK other of opinion because KPI authority does not born from UUD so that MK win Menkoinfo as side sued. Decision Court Constitution mean the loss of KPI authority in the case of giving of broadcast frequency permission. While to broadcasting world, the decision affect at central licensing which is fully mastered by central government. The conclusion, Decision Court Constitution of KPI Caused become a premature State institute almost without authority. Other of Depkominfo (Government) has absolute authority of broadcasting world without existence of control of other institute. The decision affect at central licensing conducted by central government of telecast permission and also radio either in area and also in center. Classification inexistence arranging expressly regarding particular institute which is been category as state institute which its born pursuant to Elementary Inviters and particular institute which categorized as State institute which its [his/its] born pursuant to order punish below/under Elementary Inviters cause the happening of multi interpret to regarding definite institute State and rule of law inexistence. As a result happened dispute of authority between State institute which one of both its the institute does not born from constitution but attend legal procedure in constitution court. Suggestion, conducting classification expressly regarding which state institutes just which its born from Constitution of UUD 1945, Performed a the division of and duty of authority clear and coherent between one state institute with other state institute, and also make law product able to limit government authority of control of[is full (of) broadcasting world.
|Item Type:||Thesis (Other)|
|Subjects:||K Law > K Law (General)|
|Divisions:||Faculty of Law > Department of Law|
|Depositing User:||Anggit Aldila|
|Date Deposited:||13 Jun 2012 02:38|
|Last Modified:||13 Jun 2012 02:38|
Actions (login required)