TINJAUAN YURIDIS NORMATIF TERHADAP PENERAPAN SANKSIPIDANA BAGI ANAK DI BAWAH UMUR PADA KASUS PENCURIAN DIWILAYAH HUKUM PENGADILAN NEGERI KABUPATEN MALANG(STUDI PUTUSAN DI PENGADILAN NEGERI KABUPATEN MALANG NOMOR583/PID.B/2009/PN.KPJ)

SAPUTRO NURDIANSAH, DITA (2010) TINJAUAN YURIDIS NORMATIF TERHADAP PENERAPAN SANKSIPIDANA BAGI ANAK DI BAWAH UMUR PADA KASUS PENCURIAN DIWILAYAH HUKUM PENGADILAN NEGERI KABUPATEN MALANG(STUDI PUTUSAN DI PENGADILAN NEGERI KABUPATEN MALANG NOMOR583/PID.B/2009/PN.KPJ). Other thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.

[img]
Preview
Text
Tinjauan_Yuridis_Normatif_Terhadap_Penerapan.pdf

Download (93kB) | Preview

Abstract

In case of theft that was done by minors in the legal environment of Malang District Court done by the defendant Mohammad Zaman Badruz is ironic, because basically that the defendant was 15 years old doing his theft in musholla that is located in own village. This research took the formulation of the problem What is the basic consideration in deciding judge in the case the District Court Decision of Malang Number. 583/Pid. How B/2009/PN.KPJ and errors as a basis for criminal responsibility for minors in the State Court Decision Number. 583/Pid Malang Regency.B/2009/PN.KPJ. This kind of research is normative juridical, and there are several types of research methods is the primary legal materials, legal materials sekuder, and tertiary legal materials. Techniques of data collection using the law library research and documentation and analysis of content data (content analysis). The judge decided the case the decision to use existing legal basis in the Penal Code (Law Book Criminal Code) Article 363 (1) the 4 and 5, the basic law given to the defendant judges who are still minors is very much against the Law Number. 03 Year 1997 About the Juvenile Court. For criminal responsibility for minors in Malang District Court that the defendant proven legally and convincingly make burglary pdana the weighting, so that defendants can mempertanggung responsibility on all of that the judge sentenced for 5 (five) months imprisonment. In conclusion, the judge in the basic sentence verdict was not relevant to Law No. 3 Year 1997 About the Juvenile Court and deviate from the principle of Lex specialis generalist derograt College regulations governing the more specific rules override more general nature. Accountability for the perpetrators of criminal acts that are still under-age children according to decision Number. 583/Pid.B/2009/PN.KPJ in prison related criminal penalties for 5 (five) months in reducing the time prisoners have been in the lead by the defendant, and fees charged defendants in the case of Rp. 5000, - (five thousand rupiah) and the defendants remained in detention. Keywords: Application, Criminal Sanction, Children Under Age, Theft.

Item Type: Thesis (Other)
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Law > Department of Law
Depositing User: Rayi Tegar Pamungkas
Date Deposited: 28 Mar 2012 08:16
Last Modified: 28 Mar 2012 08:16
URI: http://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/727

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item