PENGEMBANGAN CIVIL SOCIETY DI DESA Study Kasus Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Musyawarah Rencana Pembangunan (MUSRENBANG) di Desa Candirejo Kab. Magetan

Yugo Santoso, Nanang (2008) PENGEMBANGAN CIVIL SOCIETY DI DESA Study Kasus Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Musyawarah Rencana Pembangunan (MUSRENBANG) di Desa Candirejo Kab. Magetan. Other thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.

[img]
Preview
Text
PENGEMBANGAN_CIVIL_SOCIETY_DI_DESA_Study_Kasus_Partisipasi_Masyarakat_Dalam_Musyawarah_Rencana_Pembangunan.pdf

Download (93kB) | Preview

Abstract

Public Sphere is the media for every individual and society for the expression of requirement and his importance concerning political issues and development. Public sphere represents especially in prerequisite of development of democracy, where their woke up by mechanism and system to public to express opinion and mind, conducting idea transaction even dispute inequitable assumed policies and side to public. Till now role of public remain to be overruled in every development step. Idea planning of participative development which linked through Deliberation Planning of Development ( MUSRENBANG) frequently there are no connection in society aspiration especially at local level, that is countryside. This matter give strong evidence that public keep off under consideration program or at least disregarded by its aspiration in have deliberation. Have the pleasure to with that this thesis to try description about how MUSRENBANG can be made by public sphere to society as part of development of concept of civil society to citizen. This research of writer use descriptive research method that is depicting systematically and is accurate of characteristic and fact concerning population or regarding certain area, and also try to depict occurrence or situation and elaborate real situation happened factual and try to look for its truth. Research entitling: DEVELOPMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN THE VILLAGE, (case study about society participation in MUSRENBANG) the researcher take it because seeing problem which is exist in this village relate to the lack of the understanding of society for the importance of have organization to and also have deliberation, see growth of society participation had by very weak and also domicile between society and government of uneven countryside, where government of village more dominant. From existing data and pursuant to research which have been conducted in the reality society participation in order to Deliberation Planning of Development ( MUSRENBANG) in Candirejo village is less, the mentioned seen from lack of society comprehend for the importance of deliberation which have been conducted, besides factor of government of countryside alone which do not mind requirement of society alone where result of from decision of this MUSRENBANG is compared to requirement of previous year that is correction of countryside hall office and roadwork. In fact from data which is writer find its field of him there is more important requirement of society that is correction of irrigation channel and of “gorong-gorong” which is exist in this village which often caused the flood when the rain came. Its regrettable is true when aspiration of society have shall no longer be minded and now correction of and irrigation of “gorong-gorong” (saluran irigasi) of its fund is taken away from by fee of each RT which where very encumbering society it self. From what is going on indication field that conducted MUSRENBANG in Candirejo village this only just formality, why can so because of in its execution of direct society of prepare detail of decisions which later will be discussed in MUSRENBANG and more disappointing again when this deliberation is conducted and proposal agreed on to be compared to last year, besides also participant of MUSRENBANG do not be allowed for the expression of its opinion, governmental side of direct countryside confront decision as which have been specified last year remember not yet is entirely realized by development of year yesterday so that will society do not want to have to amen decision. In execution of deliberation shall really hold high familiarity value and democracy. Taking a decision do not with result of decision of side but of decision with it is of course, because this matter will bring at our own loss and more important is bliss which we expect cannot be realized. Participative development will bring into perfect life because in every decision if in harmonizing with requirement with it is of course will bring up at prosperity and efficacy

Item Type: Thesis (Other)
Subjects: J Political Science > J General legislative and executive papers
Divisions: Faculty of Social and Political Science > Department of Government Sience
Depositing User: Rayi Tegar Pamungkas
Date Deposited: 11 Jun 2012 06:48
Last Modified: 11 Jun 2012 06:48
URI: http://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/7112

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item