VITASARI, AGNY (2008) “TINJAUAN YURIDIS SOSIOLOGIS PERANAN PENYIDIK POLRI DALAM HAL PENYITAAN BARANG BUKTI MILIK PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PSIKOTROPIKA” (Studi di Polresta Malang ). Other thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.
Download (141kB) | Preview
Abuse of psycho-therapy these days specially in Unlucky region progressively disseminate wide of till to is adolescent of him, many student and or student in concerned in it. The condition of this goods as mankind threat in world and will destroy the rising generation router of nation, in this case need the existence of an cooperation all party/ side specially enforcer government officer punish for the eradication of abuse of Psikotropika. It is of course government officer enforcer of law have to can and real correct in straightening of law as according to procedure which have been specified in law and regulation. This research lift problems about role of investigator in the case of confiscation of evidence goods property of perpetrator of doing an injustice of Psikotropika, as for this research is done/conducted by in Unlucky POLRESTA. Intention of this research is to know how investigator procedure in confiscating evidence goods and know its legal consequences in the event of mistake of by procedure is investigator in confiscating evidence goods property of perpetrator of doing an injustice of Psikotropika, and also constraint faced by investigator in protecting doing an injustice evidence goods of Psikotropika. As for Method research which in using [is] Yuridis Sosiologis, its meaning in supporting making of writing of this law, writer will study from source of data whereas that is investigator procedure in confiscating evidence goods of Psikotropika got of perpetrator, besides also see execution of member of Reskoba in arrest to is later;then confiscated of evidence goods arsonist of doing an injustice of Psikotropika till inspection in room investigation of Reskoba Polresta Malang.Teknik data collecting is interview with investigator of Unlucky Reskoba Polresta and also documentation. Pursuant to result of research, Writer conclude that Though confiscation procedure have been arranged in KUHAP in the reality in practice, Procedure by investigator in confiscating evidence goods there is still interpose to mistake because in confiscating susceptable of is existence of manipulation that is the evidence goods do not be taken care of by its validity and lack of observation of head and also all party so that enable evidence goods to be confiscated the decrease, dwindling and or the evidence goods converted with other evidence goods besides oftentimes eyewitnesss at the (time) of confiscation do not know evidence goods weight and amount of Psikotropika remember weighing-machine by after existence of confiscation Investigator mistake of procedure in confiscating hence its legal consequences the investigator administrationly will in Conference of Kumplin (Penalization Discipline), Dubious of him in the form of oral exhortation and also written, postponement of promotion, detention, or released from institution by superior, besides also can be punished. Investigator earn in prretial compensatory suing and also rehabilitate by harmed partys during evidence goods the confiscated is legal goods or do not be prohibited its. To protect evidence goods of Psikotropika result of from confiscation, in Police specially in Unlucky Polresta managed by BATATIH ( Petty officer Business Prisoner and Goods Evidence), however constraint there is still faced in protecting evidence goods of Psikotropika like facilities and basic facilities less memadahi, lack of special room and place for safety evidence goods of Psikotropika where stowage of evidence of Psikotropika this still kept in room brangkas of Kasat Reskoba.
|Item Type:||Thesis (Other)|
|Subjects:||K Law > K Law (General)|
|Divisions:||Faculty of Law > Department of Law|
|Depositing User:||Rayi Tegar Pamungkas|
|Date Deposited:||09 Jun 2012 02:11|
|Last Modified:||09 Jun 2012 02:11|
Actions (login required)