TINJAUAN YURIDIS NORMATIF TERHADAP KETENTUAN PASAL 19 AYAT (2) UNDANG-UNDANG ADVOKAT TENTANG HAK ADVOKAT MENGENAI PERLINDUNGAN TERHADAP PENYITAAN DOKUMEN KLIEN

HIJRATUL AMALIYAH RAMADHANI, ANNA (2009) TINJAUAN YURIDIS NORMATIF TERHADAP KETENTUAN PASAL 19 AYAT (2) UNDANG-UNDANG ADVOKAT TENTANG HAK ADVOKAT MENGENAI PERLINDUNGAN TERHADAP PENYITAAN DOKUMEN KLIEN. Other thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.

[img]
Preview
Text
Tinjauan_Yuridis_Normatif_Terhadap_Ketentuan_Pasal.pdf - Published Version

Download (87kB) | Preview

Abstract

ABSTRACT Lawyer profession as law enforcer was identical with the client. In doing the profession, lawyer was often having trouble, especially in confiscation by investigation officer which was ruled in Law Act section 19 verse (2) and section 38 verse (1) Criminal Law Procedure Act. Method used by the writer was juridical normative. In its practice, lawyer rights and duty was often neglected by the other law enforcer that cause conflict between law enforcer, especially between lawyer and investigation officer. Confiscation in criminal law procedure was allowed to give a wide authority and make the investigation officer more effective in doing investigation and examination before a case proposed in trial. But in the other side, it was a contradiction with lawyer’s duty which was ruled by Act No.18 / 2003 about Lawyer. It was also a contradiction with section 28G Constitution 1945 with section 38 verse (1) Criminal Law Procedure Act. If the section 19 verse (2) Criminal Law Procedure Act couldn’t reveal the conflict between investigation officer and lawyer in client’s document confiscation process, since section 28G Constitution 1945 ruled the rights of every person to get protection as an individual, things or document from confiscation. But in its practice, lawyer was often faced trouble which was caused by the conflict with investigation officer which the duty related with criminal law procedure act ruled about confiscation in section 38 verse (1). If the section was conflicted, there could be used lex specialis derogate lex generalis principle where there should be a judicial review to criminal law procedure act.

Item Type: Thesis (Other)
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Law > Department of Law
Depositing User: Anwar Jasin
Date Deposited: 20 Mar 2012 13:46
Last Modified: 20 Mar 2012 13:46
URI: http://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/662

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item