TINJAUAN YURIDIS NORMATIF DASAR PERTIMBANGAN PUTUSAN HAKIM NO. 06 / Pid.B / 2007 PN. PMKS, NO. 307 / Pid / 2007 / PT. SBY, NO.2465 K / PID. SUS / 2007 DALAM MENJATUHKAN PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN YANG BERKAITAN DENGAN KASUS “CAROK” (Studi di Pengadilan Negeri Pamekasan Madura)

WAHYUDI , EDY (2010) TINJAUAN YURIDIS NORMATIF DASAR PERTIMBANGAN PUTUSAN HAKIM NO. 06 / Pid.B / 2007 PN. PMKS, NO. 307 / Pid / 2007 / PT. SBY, NO.2465 K / PID. SUS / 2007 DALAM MENJATUHKAN PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN YANG BERKAITAN DENGAN KASUS “CAROK” (Studi di Pengadilan Negeri Pamekasan Madura). Other thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.

[img]
Preview
Text
Tinjauan_Yuridis_Normatif_Dasar_Pertimbangan.pdf

Download (93kB) | Preview

Abstract

Basic considerations in formulating a decision the judge will be interesting to study because it includes the element of legal certainty, usefulness and fairness of a criminal case. One is as in the case of mass carok happened carok in Madurese culture is something that can be accepted by society. The authors here attempt to analyze the basic considerations verdict No. 06/ Pid. B/ 2007 PN. PMKS, No. 307 / pid / 2007 / PT. SBY, No. 2465 K / PID. SUS / 2007. In this research, the author uses the juridical-normative approach. The study is based on the analysis of legal materials in the from of the judge’s decision No. 06 / Pid. B / 2007 PN. PMKS, No. 307 / pid 2007 /PT. SBY, No. 2465 K / PID. SUS / 2007. for data processing, the authors used a qualitative descriptive analysis. Based on the analysis of the author of No.06/Pid.B/2007/PN.Pks verdict, Judge judge that prosecutors failed to prove that the accused guilty of the crimes that are precribed, in relation to the elements of premeditated murder. So that the District Court judge dropped criminal procedings against the defendant to imprisonment for 10 years and 6 months. From the consideration of High Court judges, as stated in Decision No. 307/Pid/2007/PT.Sby, penalty imposed against the defendant from the previous ruling made it less severe, so that the Superior Court judge sentenced him to 13 (thirteen) years’ imprisonment on defendant. It’s actually heavier that the Decision no. 06/Pid.B/2007 PN. PMKS who punish the defendant to imprisonment for 10 years and 6 months. Who’s in Decision No. 2465 K/Pid.Sus/2007, the judges rejected the appeal from the Supreme Public Posecutor. In the decision, Judge considers aspects of fairness, usefulness, and legal certainty. Keyword: elementary considerations of judges, criminal homicide, carok

Item Type: Thesis (Other)
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Law > Department of Law
Depositing User: Rayi Tegar Pamungkas
Date Deposited: 20 Mar 2012 12:22
Last Modified: 20 Mar 2012 12:22
URI: http://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/639

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item