ARIS VANDHA, CANDRA (2010) KAJIAN KRITIS PUTUSAN HAKIM PENGADILAN NEGERI KABUPATEN MALANG NOMOR: 390/Pid.B/2006/PN. KEPANJEN DAN NOMOR: 316/Pid.B/2006/PN. KEPANJEN TENTANG TINDAK PIDANA PENYALAHGUNAAN OBAT–OBATAN TERLARANG (NARKOTIKA). Other thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.
|
Text
Kajian_Kritis_Putusan_Hakim_Pengadilan_Negeri.pdf - Published Version Download (89kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Reforms in Judge authority focused on five matters. They were: (i) independent judge authority, (ii) functioning, forming justice and law certainty, (iii) checking and balancing, (iv) form law country and people power, (v) protecting human rights. Method used in this research was comparative legal by content analysis method and primary law source consisted of Regulation No.22 / 1997 about Narcotics and secondary source consisted of books, articles/opinion, journal, magazine, internet article, and law dictionary. According to existing data, the researcher found result that Judge Decision of Malang Residence State of Court Number: 390/Pid.B/2006/PN. Kepanjen and Number: 316/Pid.B/2006/PN. Kepanjen in fulfilling law certainty aspect from section 78 verse (1) alphabet b Regulation No.22 / 1997 about Narcotics with defendants Saipul Hadi Als Ipul and Febi Irianto Als Tompel were strange from law perspective since it was didn’t appropriate with Book of Criminal Law and Book of Criminal Law Procedures. In letter of prejudgment, the defendants did crime against section 78 verse (1) alphabet b Regulation No.22 / 1997 about Narcotic. Prejudgment arranged by public prosecutor unclear and incomplete, since the crime done by defendant Saipul Hadi Als Ipul was done altogether with defendant Febi Irianto Als Tompel who was trial in different place (splitted), the judge should consider that prejudgment unacceptable (niet ontvankelijk verklaard) and punishment for defendant Saipul Hadi Als Ipul was heavier than defendant Febi Irianto Als Tompel where in trial’s facts were the owner of evidences, while defendant Saipul Hadi Als Ipul held the evidences only on temporary time, so that the judge decision was far from justice and law certainty.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Other) |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Law > Department of Law (74201) |
| Depositing User: | Anwar Jasin |
| Date Deposited: | 19 Mar 2012 14:18 |
| Last Modified: | 19 Mar 2012 14:18 |
| URI : | http://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/574 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
