TINJAUAN YURIDIS SOSIOLOGIS PENYERTAAN MODAL SEBAGAI INDIKASI MODUS PENYALAHGUNAAN WEWENANG DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PADAPROYEK KAWASAN INDUSTRI GULA MASYARAKAT(KIGUMAS) DI KABUPATEN MALANG

NOVITASARI, NOVITASARI (2008) TINJAUAN YURIDIS SOSIOLOGIS PENYERTAAN MODAL SEBAGAI INDIKASI MODUS PENYALAHGUNAAN WEWENANG DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PADAPROYEK KAWASAN INDUSTRI GULA MASYARAKAT(KIGUMAS) DI KABUPATEN MALANG. Other thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.

[img]
Preview
Text
Tinjauan_Yuridis_Sosiologis_Penyertaan_Modalsebagai_Indikasi.pdf

Download (56kB) | Preview

Abstract

Obyek Research at the same time become the problem of this research [is] do and also capital earn indication in corruption doing an injustice category that happened [at] project of Kawasan Industri Gula Masyarakat ( KIGUMAS) [in] Malang City pursuant to UU No.31 year 1999 UU No.20 year jo 2001 about Eradication Of Doing An Injustice Corruption ? Modus what is [is] used by related/relevant oknum-oknum in [doing/conducting] corruption doing an injustice that happened [at] project of Kawasan Industri Gula Masyarakat( KIGUMAS) [in] Malang City ? While method which [is] used in this research [is] method approach of sosiologis yuridis, its meaning beside study law as a(n) norm namely seen rule of regulation of existing invitation, also see or symptom of realita that happened [in] society, with aim to to get problems answer which have been told. Pursuant to result of research hence can be concluded that ( 1) Corruption [is] deed [done/conducted] by someone contempted of court by using its [his/its] or misuse its power able to harm state's finance or economics of state, good to private interest, family, kroni and also [his/its] corporation. In case of[is project of Kawasan Industri gula Masyarakat ( KIGUMAS) [in] Malang Gondanglegi Sub-Province, if related to corruption doing an injustice [code/law], hence deed [done/conducted] by Government of Malang City by figuring in capital [pass/through] founding of PT. KIGUMAS, indication can in category deed of corruption doing an injustice pursuant to UU No.31 year 1999 UU No jo. 20 year 2001 about Eradication Of Doing An Injustice Corruption. Along of and also [done/conducted] capital, clearly oppose against rule of Regulation of Government of Number 105 year 2001 and Decision Of Domestic Meneteri [of] Number 29 year 2002 which it is of course have been known and comprehended by Government Of Malang City. More than anything else pursuant to report result of inspection of BPK dated 26 April 2005 of Malang City financial statement [of] budget year 2004, there are some fund which [do] not be reported. This means there [is] anticipation or indication the happening of corruption doing an injustice. ( 2) Modus operandi which [is] used in case of[is Project Of Kawasan Industri gula Masyarakat( KIGUMAS) that happened [in] Malang City, [done/conducted] by and also capital by Government of Malang City with physique Punish Limited Liability ( PT). Government Of Sub-Province Ought to be Malang realize and know that [the] mentioned cannot be agreed, because pursuant to is existing, namely Regulation of Government of No. 105 year 2001 about Management and

Item Type: Thesis (Other)
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Law > Department of Law
Depositing User: Anggit Aldila
Date Deposited: 21 May 2012 05:47
Last Modified: 21 May 2012 05:47
URI: http://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/5610

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item