UMM Institutional Repository

AN ANALYSIS ON WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK: TEACHERS’ PRACTICE VS STUDENTS’ PREFERENCE

Agustina, Lita Peggi (2019) AN ANALYSIS ON WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK: TEACHERS’ PRACTICE VS STUDENTS’ PREFERENCE. Undergraduate (S1) thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.

[img]
Preview
Text
Pendahuluan.pdf

Download (15MB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
CHAPTER I.pdf

Download (3MB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
CHAPTER II.pdf

Download (6MB) | Preview
[img] Text
CHAPTER III.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (5MB) | Request a copy
[img] Text
CHAPTER IV.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (3MB) | Request a copy
[img] Text
CHAPTER V.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (2MB) | Request a copy
[img] Text
APPENDICES.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (13MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

This study provides the students’ and teachers’ preferences for feedback in order to help lecturer to decide what particular feedback will be beneficial or influence positively the students’ performance in writing. Since there is still a mismatch between student’s preferences and lecturer’s practice from some previous researchs. The research questions in this study were about teachers’ perception about the use of Writing Corrective Feedback (WCF) in facilitating the language learning and the student’s preference or the expectation about WCF. Further, the research objectives of this study were to investigate the teachers’ perception about the use of WCF in facilitating language learning and to investigate the student’s preference and expectation about WCF. This study used quantitative design and a data set of 10 questions in the survey for students and lecturers. Further, the data were scored by using “Feedback Scale” and the scale ranged from 0 up to 1. The questionnaire was adapted from Aridah et.al (2017) The result of this study showed the students group has the higher score of direct corrective feedback which the mean score was 6.53. Moreover, the results show that the mean score of the lecturer was 5.22 which means it is higher rate rather than the student’s preference in indirect corrective feedback from students group. Therefore, it can be inferred that students prefer direct corrective feedback, while the lecturers prefer indirect corrective feedback to give correction or feedback. In conclusion, the students should follow their teacher in giving corrective feedback, which is indirect corrective feedback because it can help the students to have long term memory.

Item Type: Thesis (Undergraduate (S1))
Student ID: 2014101100311215
Thesis Advisors: Rina Wahyu Setyaningrum (0730067703), Teguh Hadi Saputro (0708078605)
Keywords: direct corrective feedback, indirect corrective feedback, Writing Corrective Feedback (WCF)
Subjects: P Language and Literature > PE English
Divisions: Faculty of Teacher Training and Education > Department of English Language Education (88203)
Depositing User: Agung Gallant Setiabudi
Date Deposited: 12 Sep 2019 11:17
Last Modified: 12 Sep 2019 11:17
URI : http://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/53324

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
UMM Official

© 2008 UMM Library. All Rights Reserved.
Jl. Raya Tlogomas No 246 Malang East Java Indonesia - Phone +62341464318 ext. 150, 151 - Fax +62341464101
E-Mail : infopus[at]umm.ac.id - Website : http://lib.umm.ac.id - Online Catalog : http://laser.umm.ac.id - Repository : http://eprints.umm.ac.id

Web Analytics

UMM Institutional Repository is powered by :
EPrints Logo