TINJAUAN YURIDIS SOSIOLOGIS PELAKSANAAN AMAR PUTUSAN PIDANA PEMBAYARAN UANG PENGGANTI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI(Studi di Kejaksaan Negeri Bandar Lampung)

Winata, Armand Ardi (2010) TINJAUAN YURIDIS SOSIOLOGIS PELAKSANAAN AMAR PUTUSAN PIDANA PEMBAYARAN UANG PENGGANTI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI(Studi di Kejaksaan Negeri Bandar Lampung). Other thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.

[img]
Preview
Text
Tinjauan_Yuridis_Sosiologis_Pelaksanaan_Amar_Putusan.pdf

Download (95kB) | Preview

Abstract

Object of this study is evaluation juridical sociologist to constraint execution of crime decision of money payment substitution in corruption act (study in Bandar Lampung Supreme Court). Problems of this study are (1) How the execution of crime decision money payment substitution in corruption act? (2) What are the factors of constraint execution of crime decision of money payment substitution in corruption act? (3) How the solution of constraints that faced in execution of crime decision in corruption act. The purposes of this research are to know the execution of crime decision of money payment in corruption act, to know the factors of constraint execution of crime decision of money payment substitution in corruption act, and to know the solution of constraints that faced in execution of crime decision of money payment substitution in corruption act. This research method to analyze the data is juridical sociologist method. It discussed because the research happened in society that related with rule of legislation and the law theories. This study focus on the execution of crime decision of money payment substitution in corruption act in Bandar Lampung Supreme Court, the factors of constraint in execution of crime decision of money payment substitution in corruption act, and the solution of constraints that faced in execution of crime decision of money payment substitution in corruption act. In short, this crime decision in Bandar Lampung Supreme Court has succeeded to execute the duty in execution of crime money substitution. As arranged by Indonesia laws number 31 year 1999 about eradication of corruption act that have been complete with Indonesia laws number 20 year 2001. The important of laws have to give distinct sanction in order not to arouse suspicion of the convict that subsider to have crime some months or year had better than refunding money substitution. Besides, the importance of government enforcer of direct corresponding law with handling of corruption case. It is important because the society still have been doctrine by bad image of the enforcers after this reform. In addition, many government enforcer have problem with corruption cases that handled by themselves.

Item Type: Thesis (Other)
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Law > Department of Law
Depositing User: Rayi Tegar Pamungkas
Date Deposited: 16 Mar 2012 13:42
Last Modified: 16 Mar 2012 13:42
URI: http://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/509

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item