PERBANDINGAN BINGKAI MEDIA DALAM PEMBERITAAN KASUS SUAP BLBI TERHADAP JAKSA URIP TRI GUNAWAN (Analisis Framing Pada Media Kompas dan Republika Edisi 330 Maret 2008)

IRAWAN, ANDIK (2008) PERBANDINGAN BINGKAI MEDIA DALAM PEMBERITAAN KASUS SUAP BLBI TERHADAP JAKSA URIP TRI GUNAWAN (Analisis Framing Pada Media Kompas dan Republika Edisi 330 Maret 2008). Other thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.

[img]
Preview
Text
PERBANDINGAN_BINGKAI_MEDIA_DALAM_PEMBERITAAN_KASUS_SUAP_BLBI_TERHADAP_JAKSA_URIP_TRI_GUNAWAN.pdf

Download (107kB) | Preview

Abstract

This research is depending on the phenome arrested Urip Tri Gunawan as coordinator case of BLBI II (The Assist Lequidity Of Indonesian Bank) by KPK (Eradication Of Corruption Commision ) at 2 March 2008. Whereas two days before, the Attorney Geberal was stopped that case by advent 35 judge wich not found any abusing or corruption case on it. It’s be acontroversion at public opinion trought the mass media publishing, including media Kompas and Republika. Both media had strategies to packaging that phenome. So that, the frame is suitable on both media interesting or point of viewing. Than the point of error and the distance of this research is how the comparation of both media frame on packaging that case. News content is product of journalism wich constructed by mass media. Cause media isn’t netral space, but aconsentrate of more interest. Than mass media now was growing as agent of construction wich packaging aphenome depend on their interesting or point of viewing by focused some importanthing or losed it. Because of that, seeker try to compare news content in regard of Urip case on media Kompas and Republika. The instrument was used by seeker to appraise the media frame of this research is Sintaksis, Skrip, Thematic and Retoris elements wich on both media, its concordant by Pan and Kosicki model. The paradigm of this research is framing analysis wich kind of comparative cualitative. Framing analysis can appraise more deeper than the other, with those elements such as Sintaksis, Skrip, Thematic and Retoris on both media. And more distinct, framing analysis had three step ways; first step is Macro Structural or the way how some phenome constructed by mass media. Than Micro Structural or packaging reality by focusing some fact, lose it and give some point of view or an angel. Than the last is Retoris or more focusing some fact with give some picture, graphigh, table etc. on this research known their 11 News, 1 Opinion, 3 Caricature and 1 Public Polling on media Kompas. Than 9 News, 2 Opinion, 1 Caricature and 1 Public polling on Republika. All those data got by documenting of news, opinion, caricature and public polling in regard of Urip Tri Gunawan case, since 3 to 30 March 2008. After that, seeker will appraise those data with Pan and Kosicki model or will operate both media frame by looking at Sintaksis, Skrip, Thematic and Retoris elements wich on both media, than compare it to answer the hiphothesys about their point of same or different frame wich on both media. The result of this research showing their same frame on media Kompas and Republika. Both media was judged that Attorner General have no more credibility after jailing Urip Tri Gunawan by KPK. (Eradication Of Corruption Commision). And both media was doubted SP3 (some letter launched by Attorney General to give order to stop an investigation some case, such as BLBI case), than it’s have to be examine once againth. Both media was judged that case is amomentum to take investigation on Institution Of Attorney General from bad judge too, and lets KPK as an auditors, including on BLBI case, and they appraise too that KPK have more credibility than Institusion Of Attorney General. In this research the result showing that some different frame too. Kompas said Urip case is the fact that Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono or Government was succesfull in increasing rate ot attacking acorruption case. Than Republika said that Government can’t keep their promise to attack the corruption, because the judge who the person have to judge acorruption is being acorruptor. The theory of Shoemaker & D. Reese said that differences on both media frame is caused on level ekstra media such as the sourch and sphere of ideology, than it’s not only depends on vision and mission both media, but also politic indication too. At those result, recommended to other seeker to search on same media at different case, such as politic, economi, culture etc. than how known on the result if their some differences frame, is it will regard of the Government work, is it bad or symphatic ways tought by media.

Item Type: Thesis (Other)
Subjects: N Fine Arts > NE Print media
Divisions: Faculty of Social and Political Science > Department of Communication Sience
Depositing User: Anggit Aldila
Date Deposited: 08 May 2012 06:11
Last Modified: 08 May 2012 06:11
URI: http://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/4723

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item