UMM Institutional Repository

TINJAUAN YURIDIS SOSIOLOGIS TERHADAP PEMBUKTIAN TINDAK PIDANA PENGGANDAAN UANG OLEH PENUNTUT UMUM ( STUDI KASUS KANJENG DIMAS TAAT PRIBADI )

Arwinsta, Robetus Deka Nanda (2019) TINJAUAN YURIDIS SOSIOLOGIS TERHADAP PEMBUKTIAN TINDAK PIDANA PENGGANDAAN UANG OLEH PENUNTUT UMUM ( STUDI KASUS KANJENG DIMAS TAAT PRIBADI ). Undergraduate (S1) thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.

[img]
Preview
Text
PENDAHULUAN.pdf

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
BAB I.pdf

Download (711kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
BAB II.pdf

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img] Text
BAB III.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (2MB)
[img] Text
BAB IV.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (424kB)
[img] Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (3MB)

Abstract

Crime of doubling money is not regulated in the Criminal Code (KUHP) but doubling or procuring money in Indonesia is the authority of Bank Indonesia as stipulated in the banking law. The problem raised is about proving the doubling of money according to criminal law in Indonesia carried out by public prosecutors and the imposition of criminal acts of doubling money in the law. The research takes the formulation of how the public prosecutor has proven in exposing criminal acts of money and What constraints experienced by the Public Prosecutor in proving revealed the occurrence of a criminal act of imposition of money. The research method in this paper is to use a sociological juridical approach, while secondary legal material is sourced from legal books, especially evidences in criminal law and criminal proceedings, and journal journals about verification by public prosecutors. Then the data in the study were analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The results of the study indicate that the criminal proof of the doubling of money committed by the Public Prosecutor against the case carried out by Dimas Kanjeng Taat Pribadi according to the Criminal Code is not regulated but can be proven by the modus operandi that is used by deceiving each of his santri by depositing a number of dowry to him to duplicate. So that it can be convicted by Article 378 of the Criminal Code and the Public Prosecutor in imposing a criminal case against the case of doubling money made by Dimas Kanjeng Taat Pribadi by proving the mode used. So from that the public prosecutor in carrying out evidence using evidence and adjusted to Article 378 of the Criminal Code. Public Prosecutors find external and internal obstacles in carrying out evidence, especially the articles in the Criminal Code that will be imposed. Therefore, the need for concrete legal regulations that discuss matters concerning doubling of money, including whether it is a criminal act or not, because when viewed from a criminal law there is no regulation related to the presupposition of money, but in fact cases of doubling money often appear in the community and cause a lot of losses for the community

Item Type: Thesis (Undergraduate (S1))
Student ID: 201510110311043
Keywords: Doubling of Money, Proof, Fraud, Public Prosecutor
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Law > Department of Law (74201)
Depositing User: Sulistyaningsih Sulistyaningsih
Date Deposited: 14 Feb 2019 07:53
Last Modified: 14 Feb 2019 07:53
URI : http://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/44275

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
UMM Official

© 2008 UMM Library. All Rights Reserved.
Jl. Raya Tlogomas No 246 Malang East Java Indonesia - Phone +62341464318 ext. 150, 151 - Fax +62341464101
E-Mail : infopus[at]umm.ac.id - Website : http://lib.umm.ac.id - Online Catalog : http://laser.umm.ac.id - Repository : http://eprints.umm.ac.id

Web Analytics

UMM Institutional Repository is powered by :
EPrints Logo