ANALISIS YURIDIS DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN(Studi Kasus Terhadap Keputusan Pengadilan Negeri Malang Nomor : 374/Pid.B/2007/PN Malang)

HERI. S., CATUR (2008) ANALISIS YURIDIS DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN(Studi Kasus Terhadap Keputusan Pengadilan Negeri Malang Nomor : 374/Pid.B/2007/PN Malang). Other thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.

[img]
Preview
Text
Analisis_Yuridis_Dalam_Perkara_Tindak_Pidana_Penipuan.pdf

Download (84kB) | Preview

Abstract

Modus deception doing an injustice in society a lot of manner pattern and also its way, among others deception with opportunity, situation, appliance, mind mind and by dozens also by using gimmick. A case of yanga happened [at] one who [is] at all have never been arrested to the a[n is criminal. [At] this case also [is] ensnared [by] section 378 KUHP jo 64 KHUP about deception [at] deceptive case [of] victim by pretense offer two inscrutable box and gold box which can fold to duplicate gold and money on condition that victim have to buy the inscrutable box a number of money determined by. As for intention of this research is to know verification of deception crime elements in inspection of PN N0:374/Pid.B/2007/Pn. And also pertimbangan of judge in deception doing an injustice decision menjatuhkan. Method which [is] used in this research [is] bibliography method ( Research library) and Field study method ( Fiield Research), what later;then give analysis picture punish from result of research which in the form of got data either from research field and also from bibliography study [pass/through] related/relevant law and regulation and literature-literature will be processed and studied so that get existing problems answer. Result of research indicate that Pursuant to section 378 section jo 64 article 1 KUHP. That, if paid attention formula in Section 378 section jo 64 article 1 KUHP, hence elements which there are in it [is] elements of Subyektif and element of obeyktif fufilled. According to economizing researcher of element of subyektif in Decision Judge deception doing an injustice case with defendant of Samsuri, element of subyektif goods

Item Type: Thesis (Other)
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Law > Department of Law
Depositing User: Anggit Aldila
Date Deposited: 07 May 2012 02:59
Last Modified: 07 May 2012 02:59
URI: http://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/4426

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item