UMM Institutional Repository

ANALISIS KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN KETERANGAN SAKSI YANG DIBACAKAN DI DALAM PERSIDANGAN KAITANNYA DENGAN “KEYAKINAN HAKIM “ MENETAPKAN PUTUSAN ( Studi di Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan )

Nazarhadi, Hana Aulia (2018) ANALISIS KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN KETERANGAN SAKSI YANG DIBACAKAN DI DALAM PERSIDANGAN KAITANNYA DENGAN “KEYAKINAN HAKIM “ MENETAPKAN PUTUSAN ( Studi di Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan ). Bachelors Degree (S1) thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.

[img]
Preview
Text
PENDAHULUAN.pdf

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
BAB I.pdf

Download (661kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
BAB II.pdf

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img] Text
BAB III.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (1MB)
[img] Text
BAB IV.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (197kB)
[img] Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (1MB)

Abstract

The statements of witnesses may be read in the hearing contained in the Minutes of Examination if the witness is unable to attend and has fulfilled the elements pursuant to Article 162 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code in Article 162 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the witness's testimony can be equalized with the witness proof which is present in the trial. This research uses sociological juridical approach method, that approach is based on objective facts according to the problems that the writer takes which is obtained in the field field. The method of analysis used is descriptive qualitative. Data of interviews, field notes and other materials that have been collected and then prepared are reported as it is and taken a logical conclusion and then analyzed with existing legal theories. Based on the results of research can be concluded that the evidentiary process adheres to the principle of the necessity of presenting witnesses in the trial. However, it is not an absolute matter, the value of its attaching proof power is to strengthen the judge's conviction, and may serve as an addition to other legitimate evidence, as long as the testimony of the witness read is in conformity with other valid evidence. The statements of witnesses read under oath can not be equalized with the statements of witnesses presented in the court under oath, as it may be that the testimony of witnesses at the investigation level is different from the statements of the witnesses presented in the hearing, therefore Article 163 indicates that the judges must be more pay attention to witness statements because it could be that the testimony of the witness in the hearing differs from the information at the investigation level. Keywords: Proof, Witnessiness, Not Attending in Court.

Item Type: Thesis (Bachelors Degree (S1))
Additional Information: 201410110311123
Uncontrolled Keywords: Proof, Witnessiness, Not Attending in Court
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Law > Department of Law
Depositing User: Sulistyaningsih Sulistyaningsih
Date Deposited: 02 Jan 2019 01:52
Last Modified: 02 Jan 2019 01:52
URI : http://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/42770

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
UMM Official

© 2008 UMM Library. All Rights Reserved.
Jl. Raya Tlogomas No 246 Malang East Java Indonesia - Phone +62341464318 ext. 150, 151 - Fax +62341464101
E-Mail : infopus[at]umm.ac.id - Website : http://lib.umm.ac.id - Online Catalog : http://laser.umm.ac.id - Repository : http://eprints.umm.ac.id

Web Analytics

UMM Institutional Repository is powered by :
EPrints Logo