UMM Institutional Repository

PUTUSAN VERSTEK DALAM PERKARA CERAI GUGAT YANG PIHAK TERGUGATNYA TIDAK DIKETAHUI ALAMAT TEMPAT TINGGALNYA ( Tinjauan Penerapan Hukum Acara terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Agama Kota Malang Nomor 636/ Pdt.G/ 2017 PA Mlg )

sanusi, Achmad (2018) PUTUSAN VERSTEK DALAM PERKARA CERAI GUGAT YANG PIHAK TERGUGATNYA TIDAK DIKETAHUI ALAMAT TEMPAT TINGGALNYA ( Tinjauan Penerapan Hukum Acara terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Agama Kota Malang Nomor 636/ Pdt.G/ 2017 PA Mlg ). Bachelors Degree (S1) thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.

[img]
Preview
Text
Pendahuluan.pdf

Download (2MB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
BAB I.pdf

Download (726kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
BAB II.pdf

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img] Text
BAB III.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (1MB)
[img] Text
BAB IV.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (256kB)
[img] Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (14MB)

Abstract

In order to divorce case, must be based on the fact that it has been reason enough, They will not be able to getting along as husband and wife , the fact laws relating to the fact materially of divorce, Where to find the fact that law, a judge must hold pace formil or run the civil law is right, Because of their functions law an event (formil) was for line to materially law .From the above, Hence writers interested raised problems. (1), are verifiable evidence any number of decisions 0636/ Pdt.G/ 2017/ PA.Mlg It was in line with the rule of law event, (2), whether judicial consideration the judge break number in case 0636/ Pdt.G/ 2017/ PA.Mlg. Have met the principle of legal certainty , as for the location of a thesis research in this is the religious court city , a law used material in this research using three a method that is , premier law material , non law secondary and materials Based on the issues raised by authors, composing can conclude as follows: (1)a, the event of applied the judge not fulfill the basic principles of, which was about why should be proven, what should be proven, who have to prove and what is not need to be proven. b, the tribunal the judges are not judging of evidence that were put forward as an appraisal that it is supposed to do against proofs in the event of civil and (2)a, the judge in inconsistent in to apply the principle of the stages in the taking of decisions, b, due to the inconsistent, so that the tribunal hakimpun has been wrong in applying law materially divorce under the provisions of article about the reason for the 19th letter (b) government regulation number 9 1975 , junto article 116 letters (b), and the existence of the supreme courts who are rarely based with judicial consideration.

Item Type: Thesis (Bachelors Degree (S1))
Student ID: 201310110311146
Keywords: decisions 0636/ Pdt.G/ 2017/ PA.Mlg, government regulation number 9 1975
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Law > Department of Law (74201)
Depositing User: Sulistyaningsih Sulistyaningsih
Date Deposited: 06 Dec 2018 02:17
Last Modified: 06 Dec 2018 02:17
URI : http://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/41527

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
UMM Official

© 2008 UMM Library. All Rights Reserved.
Jl. Raya Tlogomas No 246 Malang East Java Indonesia - Phone +62341464318 ext. 150, 151 - Fax +62341464101
E-Mail : infopus[at]umm.ac.id - Website : http://lib.umm.ac.id - Online Catalog : http://laser.umm.ac.id - Repository : http://eprints.umm.ac.id

Web Analytics

UMM Institutional Repository is powered by :
EPrints Logo