UMM Institutional Repository

ANALISIA SENGKATA MEREK TERKENAL “PIERRECARDIN” BERDASARKAN ASEAN COMMON GUIDELINES FOR THE SUBSTANTIVE EXAMINATION OF TRADEMARKS (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR.557 K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2015)

Dewi, Pitaloka Tribunal Tungga (2018) ANALISIA SENGKATA MEREK TERKENAL “PIERRECARDIN” BERDASARKAN ASEAN COMMON GUIDELINES FOR THE SUBSTANTIVE EXAMINATION OF TRADEMARKS (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR.557 K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2015). Bachelors Degree (S1) thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.

[img]
Preview
Text
pendahuluan.pdf

Download (462kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
BAB I.pdf

Download (453kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
BAB II.pdf

Download (212kB) | Preview
[img] Text
BAB III.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (226kB)
[img] Text
BAB IV.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (295kB)
[img] Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (1MB)

Abstract

Along with the development of the mark in the trade industry, must be accompanied also by the law in the field of brand protection. One of the main problems of law in the field of brand is a conflict between the owner of the mark which is identical, for example was a conflict between the brand PIERRE CARDIN France and PIERRE CARDIN Indonesia, where PIERRE CARDIN France sued PIERRE CARDIN Indonesia by reason of brand PIERRE CARDIN Indonesia registered on bad faith because it is identical with the well-known mark juridical(legalnormativeresearch).The purpose of this paper is to analyze the Supreme Court ruling No. 557 K / Pdt.Sus-Hki / 2015 Jo Commercial Court Decision No. 15 / Pdt / Sus-Brand / 2015 / PN.NIAGA.JKT.PST Contains About Lawsuit Cancellation Brand Pierre Cardin Indonesia and to know whether the brand PIERRE CARDIN France is a well-known mark based on positive law in Indonesia. Based on the results of research and discussion the author turns Supreme Court Decision No. 557 K / Pdt.Sus-Hki / 2015 does not contain legal certainty, PIERRE CARDIN France based on elements of well-known mark in Act No. 21 of 1961 on Marks Company and Commerce Trademark PIERRE CARDIN France do not meet the elements of famous brands because in this Act has not been set clearly on well-known mark, then in Act No. 19 of 1992 on Marks and Law No. 15 of 2001, PIERRE CARDIN French do not meet the elements well-known marks and the latest Trademark Law, namely Act No. 20 of 2016 on Marks and Geographical Indications french PIERRE CARDIN including well-known marks because they meet the elements well-known marks.

Item Type: Thesis (Bachelors Degree (S1))
Additional Information: 201310110311009
Uncontrolled Keywords: Decision judge, Pierre Cardin, Well-known Marks,
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
K Law > KZ Law of Nations
Divisions: Faculty of Law > Department of Law
Depositing User: Sulistyaningsih Sulistyaningsih
Date Deposited: 07 Nov 2018 06:53
Last Modified: 07 Nov 2018 06:53
URI : http://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/39515

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
UMM Official

© 2008 UMM Library. All Rights Reserved.
Jl. Raya Tlogomas No 246 Malang East Java Indonesia - Phone +62341464318 ext. 150, 151 - Fax +62341464101
E-Mail : infopus[at]umm.ac.id - Website : http://lib.umm.ac.id - Online Catalog : http://laser.umm.ac.id - Repository : http://eprints.umm.ac.id

Web Analytics

UMM Institutional Repository is powered by :
EPrints Logo