UMM Institutional Repository

IMPLEMENTASI ASAS KEBEBASAN BERBICARA DALAM PASAL 27 AYAT (3) UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2008 TENTANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK DITINJAU DARI PASAL 28 UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 1945

Indrianto, Diana Novelica (2018) IMPLEMENTASI ASAS KEBEBASAN BERBICARA DALAM PASAL 27 AYAT (3) UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2008 TENTANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK DITINJAU DARI PASAL 28 UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 1945. Bachelors Degree (S1) thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.

[img]
Preview
Text
Pendahuluan.pdf

Download (694kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
BAB I.pdf

Download (469kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
BAB II.pdf

Download (184kB) | Preview
[img] Text
BAB III.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (234kB)
[img] Text
BAB IV.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (80kB)
[img] Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (2MB)

Abstract

Freedom of speech is a human right that has been adopted by the constitution. But the ITE Act issued a silence on freedom of speech. This research takes the formulation of problems between the implementation of the principle of freedom of speech in Article 28 paragraph (3) of the ITE Law in terms of Article 28 of the 1945 Constitution, its legal forms, and the ideal legal construction for the freedom of speech of Indonesian citizens. The aim is to understand the normative implementation of the freedom of speech of the ITE Act that is contrary to the Constitution in Indonesia. Discussion of this issue using the Normative Juridical method. Primary data sources were obtained from leprosy research such as separate regulation, secondary data obtained from books and scientific papers related to the topic to be studied. The data sources are analyzed descriptively qualitative. Data collection is a documentary study of primary and secondary raw materials. Based on the results of research that freedom of speech is still polemic between the Law of ITE with the Constitution. Legal protection of freedom of speech in social media is clear in the Constitution, Human Rights Law, and Press Law. Better freedom of speech is not just limited to cultivate something positive, also must be in the case of a counter or negative. It is necessary to enforce strict bans in the details of decisions for human rights violators. Needed for defamation ceremony in article 27 paragraph (3) UU ITE.

Item Type: Thesis (Bachelors Degree (S1))
Additional Information: 201410110311341
Uncontrolled Keywords: Speaking, Information, Electronics
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Law > Department of Law
Depositing User: Officer Repository
Date Deposited: 30 Oct 2018 02:53
Last Modified: 30 Oct 2018 02:53
URI : http://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/38850

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
UMM Official

© 2008 UMM Library. All Rights Reserved.
Jl. Raya Tlogomas No 246 Malang East Java Indonesia - Phone +62341464318 ext. 150, 151 - Fax +62341464101
E-Mail : infopus[at]umm.ac.id - Website : http://lib.umm.ac.id - Online Catalog : http://laser.umm.ac.id - Repository : http://eprints.umm.ac.id

Web Analytics

UMM Institutional Repository is powered by :
EPrints Logo