ANALISIS PUTUSAN HAKIM YANG KELIRU DALAM MENENTUKAN KUALIFIKASI PELAKU PADA PUTUSAN PERKARA NOMOR 50/PID.B/2023/PN.YYK

Margaretha, Putri Chynthia (2024) ANALISIS PUTUSAN HAKIM YANG KELIRU DALAM MENENTUKAN KUALIFIKASI PELAKU PADA PUTUSAN PERKARA NOMOR 50/PID.B/2023/PN.YYK. Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.

[thumbnail of PENDAHULUAN.pdf]
Preview
Text
PENDAHULUAN.pdf

Download (1MB) | Preview
[thumbnail of BAB 1.pdf]
Preview
Text
BAB 1.pdf

Download (472kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of BAB 2.pdf]
Preview
Text
BAB 2.pdf

Download (834kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of BAB 3.pdf] Text
BAB 3.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (397kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of BAB 4.pdf] Text
BAB 4.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (124kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of Lampiran.pdf]
Preview
Text
Lampiran.pdf

Download (76MB) | Preview

Abstract

The judge's decision is the crown of a case being examined so that in making a decision the judge must consider all aspects of the decision. The verdict handed down by the judge is one thing that becomes a benchmark for legal purposes, it must be considered whether the defendant gets justice and legal certainty, and no less important whether the verdict provides benefits for the defendant and the general public. For this reason, the judge needs to give consideration in accordance with the legal facts obtained at the trial in order to know the things
behind the verdict.
This type of research is juridical-empirical (socio-legal research). The juridical legal approach is carried out by identifying and conceptualizing law as norms, rules, legal regulations that apply at a certain time and place as a product of a certain sovereign state power which is then often also referred to as doctrinal legal research
The result of this study is to analyze one of the judges' decisions of the Yogyakarta. District Court in case number 50/Pid.B/2023/PN. The judge has mixed up the word "inclusion" in Article 55 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code "participating" and Article 56 paragraph (1) "assisting to do" in the ruling. Basically, it cannot simultaneously be said that the word "inclusion" of Article 55 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code "participates" and Article 56 paragraph (1) "helps to do" be made 1 (one) in the sentence of the verdict and this causes errors in determining criminal qualifications.

Item Type: Thesis (Undergraduate)
Student ID: 202010110311570
Keywords: Keywords: Judge's decision, "inclusion" of Article 55 of the Criminal Code, "helping to do" Article 56 of the Criminal Code
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Law > Department of Law (74201)
Depositing User: 202010110311570 putrichynthia
Date Deposited: 31 Jan 2024 07:11
Last Modified: 31 Jan 2024 07:11
URI: https://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/3247

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item