TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN TINDAK PIDANA PEMBERIAN KETERANGAN PALSU KEDALAM SURAT DAN AKTE OTENTIK (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Kepanjen Perkara NO.402/Pid.B/2008/PN.KPJ)

HARDIYANSYAH , RIZKI (2009) TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN TINDAK PIDANA PEMBERIAN KETERANGAN PALSU KEDALAM SURAT DAN AKTE OTENTIK (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Kepanjen Perkara NO.402/Pid.B/2008/PN.KPJ). Other thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.

[img]
Preview
Text
Tinjauan_Yuridis_Terhadap_Putusan_Tindak_Pidanapemberian.pdf - Published Version

Download (92kB) | Preview

Abstract

In march 2007 at civil note office Kab. Malang Ali Topan orders to laid faked explanation intoes a authentic official document, that is birth certificate quotation because defendant deed Ali Topan gives explanation to civil note demography body head Kab. Malang, Dra. F Cholis Bidajati, MM, that he gived on 22 marches 1982 actually defendant borns date 22 marches 1983. Actually defendant Ali Topan doesn't born date 22 marches 1982 but defendant Ali Topan borns date 22 marches 1983 based on marriage deed quotation between defendant Ali Topan and the wife that named: Anik Atul Yeni Farida. in this case is at falsifies where in marriage book witness Anik Atul Yeni Farida. This writing takes problem formulation: 1. How does judge deliberation in give decision in verdict No. 402/Pid.B/2008/PN.KPJ appropriate based on act 263 verse1 and 2 KUHP? This writing uses method approaches yuridis-normatif, data kind or law ingredient is got from positive law, among others court decision and legislation shaped primary data. with got from book, encyclopaedia, journal, dictionary, and article that got at that good mass media is media prints or electronic (internet) shaped tertiary data. Case analysis, that is based on deed borns, citizen sign card, diploma Muhammadiyah Senior High School, police note identity card, parents statement. clearly that is Ali Topan borns in the year 1982 and not 1983. The conclusion, that accusation at accusation by publik procecutor and judge assembly decision towards defendant Ali Topan about mail forgery doing an injustice and authentic official document not yet proved validly and convince break act 263 verse1 and 2 KUHP.

Item Type: Thesis (Other)
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Law > Department of Law
Depositing User: Anwar Jasin
Date Deposited: 24 Apr 2012 09:05
Last Modified: 24 Apr 2012 09:05
URI: http://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/2898

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item