IMPLEMENTASI PASAL 18 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 31 TAHUN 1999TENTANG PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI, MENGENAIPIDANA TAMBAHAN BERUPA PEMBAYARAN UANG PENGGANTI(Studi di Kejaksaan Negeri Kepanjen)

Prihandoko , Dani (2008) IMPLEMENTASI PASAL 18 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 31 TAHUN 1999TENTANG PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI, MENGENAIPIDANA TAMBAHAN BERUPA PEMBAYARAN UANG PENGGANTI(Studi di Kejaksaan Negeri Kepanjen). Other thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.

[img]
Preview
Text
aqa.pdf

Download (57kB) | Preview

Abstract

Research Object in this thesis is about implementation section 18 UU no. 31 years 1999 about eradication of corruption doing an injustice, concerning additional crime in the form of payment of substitution money, study in judiciary Country of Kepanjen. Problems which is taken in this writing is How implementation section 18 Law of No. 31 year 1999 about Eradication of Doing An Injustice Corruption, concerning additional crime in the form of payment of money substitution of corruption doing an injustice in Public attorney of Country of Kepanjen and also do law constraint which possible happened from implementation section 18 Law of No. 31 year 1999 about Eradication of Doing An Injustice Corruption, concerning additional crime in the form of payment of money substitution of corruption doing an injustice in Public Attorney of Country of Kepanjen. Target of this research is to know implementation from section 18 Law of No. 31 year 1999 about Eradication of Doing an Injustice Corruption, concerning additional crime in the form of payment of money substitution of corruption doing an injustice in Public attorney of Country of Kepanjen and also to know resistances which possible happened to relate to implementation from section 18 Law of No. 31 year 1999 about Eradication of Doing An Injustice Corruption, concerning additional crime in the form of payment of money substitution of corruption doing an injustice in Public Attorney Of Country of Kepanjen. Method weared in analyzing data is descriptive qualitative. Which becomes focus in this research is execution of additional crime in the form of payment of substitution money in Public attorney of Country of Kepanjen, pursuant to section 18 UU Corruption. In principle additional crime cannot be dropped by self-supporting without fundamental crime because of in character only representing addition from something fundamental matter. In public attorney of Country of Kepanjen implementation section 18 this UU Corruption disagree with rule, matter which is influencing is interpretation of section 38 letter of C UU Corruption, expressing to execute substitution money with civil suing instrument. In Public attorney of Country of Kepanjen implementation section 18 UU Corruption disagree with rule of section. In execution execute in the reality use rule of section 38 letter of C, that is with civil suing. In this corruption case of attorney of executor can only execute crime serve a sentence 1 (one year) and penalty of Rp. 5.000.000,00 and also land; ground of SHM No. 01902 on behalf of Lupi Susanti which located in Countryside of Donomulyo, for the price of Rp.12.000.000,00. Pursuant to breakdown above hence can be pulled by conclusion that implementation from section 18 UU about Corruption do not walk in Public Attorney of Country of Kepanjen. This Matter because of many constraint factor which for example rule of UU bewildering between section 18 and section 38 letter of C UU Corruption and also problems execute money of substitution using mechanism sue civil cost money case which by dozens roof-gutter which must first by attorney, considering its minim of salary hence attorney cannot fulfill all to execute. From conclusion above hence writer give suggestion that better there is coherent to justice decision which is its contents express can be confiscated henceforth by auction by State properties estate Punished to pay for substitution money, if in execution execute to be punished to make against law. So that do not need mechanism sue civil which need costly expense. And also as expectation prosperity of attorney start from salary, operational costs, facilities and basic facilities to be paid attention by broken government, to corruption link and improve public attorney performance.

Item Type: Thesis (Other)
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Law > Department of Law
Depositing User: Anggit Aldila
Date Deposited: 23 Apr 2012 05:01
Last Modified: 23 Apr 2012 05:01
URI: http://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/2726

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item