TINJAUAN YURIDIS PERLINDUNGAN SAKSI SEKALIGUS KORBAN KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA(Studi Komparatif Antara Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 Tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban)

PRIHAMBODO , THUNANG (2008) TINJAUAN YURIDIS PERLINDUNGAN SAKSI SEKALIGUS KORBAN KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA(Studi Komparatif Antara Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 Tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban). Other thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.

[img]
Preview
Text
azx.pdf

Download (55kB) | Preview

Abstract

The existence of victim-Eyewitness of household harassment in the process of jurisdiction is obviously needed due to the success of session depends on and determined by the presence of victim-Eyewitness. Victim-Eyewitness is hoped to explain the series of events related with the trial subject. Victim-Eyewitness completed with the proof will help the judge to make equal objective decision based on the fact given. This law paper takes the question formulation on the Comparison of Protection to victim-Eyewitness of Household Harassment between Law No. 24 of 2004 about Erasing Household Harassment and Law No. 13 of 2006 about The Protection of Victim-Eyewitness from the aspects of : (1) the shape of protection to victim-Eyewitness of household harassment; (2) The mechanism of the protection; (3) The function and role of the interested institution. This research used comparative juridical approach, performed by comparing the synchronization level horizontally by assessing the Law No. 23 of 2004 about Erasing Household Harassment and Law No. 13 of 2006 about The Protection of Victim-Eyewitness. The result showed that the protections given to the victim-Eyewitness: obtaining health service, assistance at the level of investigation, pursuit, investigation at court level, psychological enforcement, spiritual, protection from family, police, judiciary, advocate, social institute. The mechanism should be done by the victim was: applying the protection to Court or LPSK. The function and role of the related institutions were similar in protecting the victim, either coming from government, Law upholder or LPSK. In conclusion, the protection was given in some mechanism ruled in Section 16 to 38 of Law No. 23 of 2004 about Erasing Household Harassment and Section 39 Law No. 13 of 2006 about Protection of victim-Eyewitness.

Item Type: Thesis (Other)
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Law > Department of Law
Depositing User: Anggit Aldila
Date Deposited: 23 Apr 2012 04:23
Last Modified: 23 Apr 2012 04:23
URI: http://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/2715

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item