ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI MADIUN NOMOR : 67/Pid.B/2009/PN. Kd. MnDALAM PERKARA KERUSUHAN ANTAR ANGGOTA PERGURUAN PENCAK SILAT

HADI SAPUTRA, IMAM YOYOK (2010) ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI MADIUN NOMOR : 67/Pid.B/2009/PN. Kd. MnDALAM PERKARA KERUSUHAN ANTAR ANGGOTA PERGURUAN PENCAK SILAT. Other thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.

[img]
Preview
Text
Analisis_Yuridis_Putusan_Pengadilan_Negeri_Madiun.pdf

Download (88kB) | Preview

Abstract

The research based on the author want to know the rationales of judge in judging criminal case of riot that done by pencak silat members and the sanction impact of the judge verdict to the defendant and the victims. Recall the riot has make community wory. The research aimed at knowing the case position among pencak silat members based on Madiun District Court Verdict No : 67/Pid.B/2009/PN.Kd.Mn, knowing the judge consideration in the Madiun District Court Verdict No : 67/Pid.B/2009/PN.Kd.Mn, knowing how fart the sanction impact of Madiun District Court Verdict No : 67/Pid.B/2009/PN.Kd.Mn toward the disputing parties. The used menthod by writer is normative approach menthod, the primary law materials that is the copy of Madiun District Court Verdict No : 67/Pid.B/2009/PN.Kd.Mn, pancasila norms, constitution of 1945, legislation in the form of criminal codes, criminal agenda code. The secondary materials is literature, magazine, article, and scientific writing, the previous research and from internet that related with teh problem. Then all legal materials be analyzed with content analysis to know and analyze the judge verdict toward some problems. Basic conclusion for the judge considerations are, juridicial consideration (material and formal) and sociological consideration. About the material and formal juridical consideration, the judge verdict has fulfill the aspect. But the verdict less consider the sociological consideration. The verdict give direct impact toward victims or defendant. And the Madiun District Court Verdict No : 67/Pid.B/2009/PN.Kd.Mn considered as too light so the judge verdict in giving 2 months jail to the defendant does not produce wary effect. Because of that, the judge in giving verdict should produce wary effect so they will not repeat their action in the future

Item Type: Thesis (Other)
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Law > Department of Law
Depositing User: Rayi Tegar Pamungkas
Date Deposited: 16 Apr 2012 04:19
Last Modified: 16 Apr 2012 04:19
URI: http://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/2266

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item