BAGUS WIHANDOYO, FARIET (2009) ANALISA YURIDIS PUTUSAN HAKIM PENGADILAN NEGERI BANGIL NOMOR : 366 / Pid. B/ 2006/ PN. Kab. Pas. Bgl TENTANG TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DENGAN TERDAKWA HM. AEDYLLAH EDYSANTOSO BIN SUMARNO. Other thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.
Analisa_Yuridis_Putusan_Hakim_Pengadilan_Negeribangil.pdf - Published Version
Download (90Kb) | Preview
Study object in writing of this thesis is about judge decision about not corruption crime, where its defendant is H.M. Aedyllah Edy Santoso bin Sumarno broken to be free by judge. At judge of district court, decision Bangil No: 366/Pid. B/2006/PN Sub-Province Pasuruan-Bangil about corruption crime with defendant H.M. Aedyllah Edy Santoso bin Sumarno, researcher finds problems evaluated from rule of law aspect both formal and material, justice aspect for defendant and public and efficacy aspect. Existence of negligence in making of assertion letter by public prosecutor assessed by judge unmatched to arranged in section 143 sentences (2) KUHAP causes assertion of cancellation for the shake of law so that defendant is freed. This research applies writing method of yuridis normative. Law material type applied is primary law material, namely judge of district court decision Bangil No: 366/Pid. B/2006/PN Sub-Province Pasuruan-Bangil. Hereinafter about secondary law material is law material that is supporting primary law material, among others KUHAP, KUHP, and judicial power law, and tertiary law material namely books, journal, magazine, internet, dictionary article and encyclopedia. Based on writer analysis that in judge of district court decision Bangil No: 366/Pid. B/2006/PN Sub-Province Pasuruan-Bangil, evaluated from formal rule of law aspect has not pursuant to arranged at section 197 sentences (1) KUHAP. There are some point mentioned but less completely and even there are rule that is not is mentioned at all, particularly its material aspect at the decision unmatched to section 143 sentences (2) KUHAP because there is un-accuracy in making assertion letter. At justice, aspect for defendant and public in this decision has not fulfilled, because judge is more majoring is rule of law aspect compared to justice aspect. While its efficacy aspect in this decision also has not fulfilled for absence of effect to discourage and a regret to deed which has been done defendant, public also feels not to get satisfaction to law enforcer government officer performance to its performance is especially in this case is public prosecutor.
|Item Type:||Thesis (Other)|
|Subjects:||K Law > K Law (General)|
|Divisions:||Faculty of Law > Department of Law|
|Depositing User:||Anwar Jasin|
|Date Deposited:||02 Apr 2012 04:19|
|Last Modified:||02 Apr 2012 04:19|
Actions (login required)